Aviation Impossibilities: Deconstructing the Official Story of the 9/11 Hijackings and Air Defense Failures

Aviation Impossibilities: Deconstructing the Official Story of the 9/11 Hijackings and Air Defense F ^ | 9/8/2024 | https://ic911.org/

[Georgia Girl 2]

So you think somebody is going to fly a 767 at sea level like an f16? And then hit a steel building and penetrate it wings and all? Sorry buddy but chit will fall off. Talk about nonsense. 😆

[NorthMountain]

Three somebodies did, so I don’t have to speculate on the matter. And I know you don’t know what you’re talking about when you start babbling about holograms ...

[yelostar]

The numeric coding found in 9/11 is extensive. Some minor examples:

September 11 has been referred to as “the new Pearl Harbor” - in numerous articles over the years, in a 2013 documentary, and separately in a book published in 2004.

Pearl Harbor was on December 7, 1941, 12/7, like 127. Coincidentally on 9/11, buildings 1, 2 and 7 fell.

Of course there have been numerous terrorist attacks and bombings worldwide since 9/11. Two specifically occurred on the 11th day of the month.

March 11, 2004 was the date of the Madrid train bombings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Madrid_train_bombings

July 11, 2006 was the date of the Mumbai (India) train bombings.

https://www.cnbctv18.com/india/2006-mumbai-train-bombings-16-years-on-timeline-of-events-that-followed-horrific-incident-terrorism-14074772.htm

July 11, 7/11 - the numbers 7 and 11 are not only in the the date:

Seven blasts were triggered in the span of 11 minutes in the first-class suburban train compartments leaving 189 dead and several injured.

From 9.11.2001 to the Madrid bombing on 3.11.2004 - is a span of 911 days, not including the start or end dates - starting the count on 9.12.2001.

If we include (add) the event date as day 1, it’s a span of 912 days.

From the Madrid bombing on 3.11.2004 to the Mumbai bombing on 7.11.2006 - is a span of 851 days, not including the start or end dates - starting the count on 3.12.2004.

Summing the divisors of 851 (1 + 23 + 37 + 851) = 912.

Summing the divisors of 911 (1 + 911) = 912.

The significance of the number 912 could include numerology - 9 + 1 + 2 = 93, as in UA93, the flight intended for the Capitol or WH, that went down in PA.

The Pentagon broke ground on September 11, 1941. It was completed on January 15, 1943. It's height is 77 feet. The plane that hit the Pentagon was AA77.

More on 127. From 9/11 to the following (2002) anniversary of the Pentagon's completion in 1943 (January 15) - is 127 days, including the end date.

Besides being the date, the number eleven is seen often throughout the WTC event, like flight AA11; note in the above Wiki page the WTC event took place between approximately 8:13 a.m. and 10:03 a.m. - 110 minutes.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Instead of continuing to drink the kool aid go watch the videos of the planes hitting the towers with the sound turned off. The planes literally disappear into the buildings wings and all. Its so fake you can’t believe you ever believed it.

[NorthMountain]

Sweetie pie, I originally saw it 23 years ago with the sound off. Your argument is bogus.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Yeh Honey Bun those planes are so strong a Delta Jets wing tip just knocked the tail off a commuter jet in a little scrape on the runway at Hartsfield. They’re live streaming it on YouTube. So much for a plane plowing through a steel building. 😆

[NorthMountain]

Hey Cutesey Poo: 350,000lb of aluminum, steel, jet fuel and assorted on-board stuff moving at 200-300kt doesn’t just bounce off a glass curtain wall. You can BS yourself ... you can’t BS everybody else.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Give it up. A plane does not crash into a building intact with the wings just cutting through the side of the building and disappearing inside. Well, maybe in a Mission Impossible movie. Or a Hologram. 😆

[NorthMountain]

Give it up.

Go take a physics class or two. Maybe also some mechanical engineering. If you have the mental capacity for it, you'll learn something.

If not, you'll continue posting your nonsense on FR.

[hellinahandcart]

You might as well be claiming that paper and cardboard won’t go through a shredder.

And that would have been one hell of a hologram. People on the ground looking up saw the planes. People in the buildings looking out saw the planes. People across the rivers in other boroughs and states saw the planes.

Not only that, but real people actually died on those planes.

Already had to deal with this Troofer nonsense for 23 years. I am actually glad that I won’t have to endure that many more 9/11s.

[bankwalker]

Any engineers in that bunch? LOL!!

[Georgia Girl 2]

Those people on the planes died but I don’t think they died the way you think they died.

[Paal Gulli]

"...Although it is true, the fire was not hot enough to melt steel,..."

This is the Straw Man in the argument. Or a Red Herring. Pick your metaphor.

They've set the goal post far to high by stipulating the steel would have had to melt for the building to fail. This is not the case, and whoever first wrote this supposition is either a science idiot or a liar or both.

A blacksmith doesn't have to heat steel to melting to shape it, he only has to heat it to a plastic state. This generally happens when the steel is just hot enough to glow bright red, which happens somewhere around 800°F.

Steel melts at about 3000°F (1650° Communist) but begins to weaken (according to this chart) at about 700°F (375°C). And it's lost half its strength by 500°C (930°F). Even if the engineers had built in a 100% safety margin, it would have been susceptible to failure before it reached 1000°F, 2000 degrees short of melting.

It wasn't necessary that the steel melt, not even close.

Like all the rest of the 911 "Truther" LIES, this one preys on the general public's basic ignorance of science, construction, mechanics and demolition devices and practices.

On an unrelated note, high-velocity bullets sometimes fail (explode) in flight, which too often the hoopleheads attribute to it "melting." By the self-same token, the bullet only has to get hot enough to reach a plastic state, then it begins to deform under the intense centripetal forces. Deformed, it loses all semblance of aerodynamic stability, begins to tumble and almost instantly tears itself apart. It didn't melt, it softened and slung itself apart.

[scrabblehack]

I heard that Barbara Olsen tried to negotiate with them on the Pentagon flight...not sure if there’s a recording of it.

[hellinahandcart]

Last sentence I’m going to waste on you:

Rather than staging hijackings, killing the passengers in ways you don’t dare describe, and rigging the holographic projection of three airplanes that could have been seen live at any angle by a million or more people on site in Manhattan and DC, wouldn’t it have been easier, cheaper, and more efficient to just fly the planes into the damned buildings?

No need to respond.

[ransomnote]

All the people objecting to the content of this thread thus far apparently never actually read or watched the content. They raised objections which did not match the assertions of the video.
The simulations you mentioned, the assertions by the military that their first account of their actions to Congress were all lies and something else happened instead, the detailed reason why those men weren’t qualified to handle the planes the way those aircraft actually moved...

Their content doesn’t cover what brought down the towers. I thought it was interesting. I don’t know what happened. I know the military and the Secret Service had time to react and never did, and then covered their tracks, which sadly sounds like the attempted assassination of Trump.

[Pikachu_Dad]

Those planes did hit those towers. They went into those towers as shredded pieces of planes through the windows. The jet fuel was aerosolized. Then there was a massive VAPOR CLOUD EXPLOSION.

The planes that hit the Empire State building all left big holes in the building.

Your grasp of physics is tenuous.

[Pikachu_Dad]

It would be very difficult for anyone else to simulate your exact erratic path and crash.

But it is very easy for any other pilot to have a similarly disastrous end.

How hard is it to aim at a very large target. Not hard at all.

Did they each hit at the height that they intended to hit at? probably not. they were probably off on their intended vertical hit point.

[CodeJockey]

Who has four hours to watch this. Exactly who do they say is responsible? In no more that two sentences.

[Pikachu_Dad]

I have more than four hours.