Smith was not “stripped” of anything. The legality of all Special Counsel appointments was called into question and the judge gave an outlandish reading to the law. She always knew and expected her decision to be appealed.
This is now about far more than just Smith’s pursuit of Trump.
Can you elaborate on your post? It sounds like you’re suggesting stuff that needs to be fleshed out.
Outlandish?
Of course it was going to be appealed, but you seem to have not actually familiarized yourself with the ruling and just read the headlines.
Oh, and you don’t even have the right judge or case. This isn’t an appeal.