Posted on 08/19/2024 6:10:46 AM PDT by airdalechief
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 opinion posted late Friday, has blocked the Biden Administration’s Title IX rules that would force schools that receive public funding to allow trans-identifying males into girls’ bathrooms, locker rooms, and sports.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailywire.com ...
Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson, and Gorsuch – a Trump appointee – dissented.
Gorsuch ?
It’s simple. When Congress enacted Title IX, there was no intent to force biological men into women’s sports.
This is an ideologically driven difference in the interpretation of the basic facts regarding whether or not someone is sane or not. There is no argument possible about this: either one side or the other will be suppressed.
Biden wanted the SCOTUS to allow the new Title IX rules to remain in effect during the appeals process as the cases worked worked their way through the lower courts.
Lower courts had suspended some of the new Title IX rules, SCOTUS allowed those suspensions to remain in effect during the appeals process.
SCOTUS didn’t rule in favor of the new Title IX.
SCOTUS didn’t rule against the new Title IX.
This wasn’t about the merits of the cases. This was just a procedural ruling concerning the appeals process.
airdalechief
Gorsuch, as a libertarian, thinks “equal protection” extends to sexual deviancy and psychoses, so that the government has the authority to coerce social acceptance of deviancy and insanity just as it has authority to coerce discrimination on the basis of race.
*********
It’s simple — when “equal protection” was added to the Constitution, there was no intent to alow Congress to force biological men into women’s sports. There’s nothing libertarian about ignoring legislative intent so as to expand governmental power.
Gorsuch will be our new Kennedy regarding sexual deviant court cases. Horrible pick by Trump.
"Supreme Court Blocks Biden’s Title IX Rules That Allowed Men In Women’s Sports"
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
If Congress had done its duty to impeach and remove likewise corrupt OBiden from office for his constitutionally indefensible dictates, then the Supreme Court would be processing its case load faster in compliance with the Constitution.
In this example, Congress is ignoring that OBiden is ignoring the only power that the states have given to the feds to make sex-related protection laws limits such power to voting rights problems, evidenced by the 19th Amendment.
"19th Amendment:
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Since worthless incumbent career federal lawmakers and renegade states have repeatedly proven that they are enemies of the people imo, it is now up to Democratic and Republican Trump supporters to effectively "impeach and remove" ALL (exceptions?) state and federal lawmakers and executives in November.
In other words, it's now up to Democratic and Republican Trump supporters to support hopeful Trump 47 with a new, Constitution-respecting Congress, new state lawmakers too, not only so that he will not be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term, but will support him to quickly finish draining the swamp.
Finally, let's not allow the anti-Trump media try to fade our memories of what we witnessed on July 13.
Down the Memory Hole: Google Hides Autocomplete Suggestions Related to Trump Assassination Attempt (7.28.24)
This was a bad decision by Gorsuch But he has been infinitely better than Trump’s other two picks in the majority of cases.
Funny how this is all going one way. You rarely, if ever, hear of a girl wanting to use the mens facilities.
Still trying to find where in that pesky constitution thingie, that the fed was granted the right to regulate both sports and education.......
It is true this is not a final ruling. However, by allowing the stay to remain in place, the court is stating (1) the plaintiffs trying to repeal the law have a reasonable chance to do so and (2) it is not manifestly unjust to discriminate against sexual identity.
If you think the Constitution empowers the Federal government to enforce an unconstrained "freedom to choose," as many libertarians do, then there is no limit to the coercive power the government can wield to combat "repressive" historical social norms embodied in law, such as non-recognition of "gay marriage."
What the ever loving eff do they have on Gorsuch?!?
The Constitution is a control on government authority ... Not on rights!
Those come from God!
Yep, I’m happy with the Court ruling.
I’m sure the case will eventually make it’s way to the Court’s schedule. I hope Gorsuch comes around when the Court eventually hears the case.
Gorsuch has two young teen daughters. Not much of a father.
The problem is that the elite in this country are drunk with power and a firm belief in their own righteousness (especially when their preferred policies enhance their income and position). As a consequence, they think there is no limit to what they may do to "improve" society, and no rational examination of their beliefs to see if they are correct or accord with the limits of Constitutional authority.
For the reasons you stated above, this machine was invented to fix that problem:
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.