More 2A news.
If there is ANY justice at all - we ought to be seeing about 90% of all “regulations” and “rules” across the alphabet agencies come crashing down. According to the Chevron Defense case - literally 100% of the “rules” and “regulations” established by these agencies, that are not explicitly spelled out in legislation/statute, are by default - unconstitutional.
Imagine - not only the ATF and their myriad of complicated rules and mandates - but the EPA - I’m waiting to support someone (or an entity) filing a lawsuit against the regulations at the EPA the mandate DEF/SCR/EGR on diesels, for example.
Cheveron ruling did more to harm elected representative government than anything I can think of.
More 2A news.
Chevron was the nail in the coffin for this as well. Congress must define what is and is not a sbr not some agency bureaucrats. Sbr have been defined by law so expanding that would take another signed law from the legislature post chevron smack down.
This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
This is good news. ATF should be ABOLISHED. DEFUND, DISSOLVE
and ABOLISH!!
NFA is the unconstitutional root of the problem. Let’s have the courts take that up.
SBR is the dumbest portion of the NFA “law”.
Q: What is the purpose to a stock?
A: To improve accuracy.
Q: Is accuracy an important part of shooting?
A: It is a fundamental part of shooting.
Q: Does adding a stock to a pistol make it easier to hide?
A: Are you stupid or what.
Q: So what is the difference between a pistol and an SBR?
A: A pistol is more concealable.
Q: So why is an SBR more dangerous?
A: You got me!
Between Bruen and Chevron, may the beast be put back in the box.