Posted on 08/08/2024 1:14:23 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
US Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib reposted on Wednesday a doctored poll claiming that 47% of Israelis believe IDF soldiers have a right to rape Palestinians. It was tweeted by Noura Erakat, who later admitted on X that it was fake.
Erakat posted a doctored image of an N12 poll on Wednesday, stating, “When you tell a society they have a right to commit genocide, surely they believe they have a right to rape,” suggesting that 47% of Israelis believe that it is justified to rape a handcuffed terrorist.
In her post, which has since been deleted, Erakat shared an image with the poll’s title completely changed. Originally, N12’s poll illustrated the Israeli public’s stance regarding the claims that the Israeli government relies on terrorism supporters.
(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...
Don’t believe a word this blowhard says.
i may be in favor of terrorists being raped...
i am leaning a bit in that direction.
Who is the sick twisted POS?
Her for getting tricked by a fake post or the Israeli soldiers who were actually raping detainees?
I would hope that the good people at X would permanently ban Noura Erakat.
If I were running X, I would.
Really? Righteous rape? You doing the raping?
One of our resident putinista Joo haters was pushing this crap here a few weeks ago.
Like #6 above
Projection. More Alinsky radicals construct. It’s not even thought at this point. It’s reflex.
This is projection and it is bizarre! A story created out of thin air to enhance an agenda.
Terrorist should be raped with a baton just before being executed... Sounds reasonable to me.
It should noted that no one apparently wrote in saying they wanted to rape her.
Um, what?
I wonder... Did he brother rape her, or was that consensual incest?
All polls are fake.
Prove me wrong.
“All polls are fake.”
Agreed - especially the ones where people say Elvis is dead.
Pallywood
You don’t rape a handcuffed terrorist; you KILL him!
A little background about Islamic Law could be helpful in understanding what is going on. The Muslim Hamas, having committed mass rape and continued rape of hostages in accordance with Islamic Law are going to look to falsely accuse Israel of similar crimes in order to get themselves off the hook. This is especially important for the Muslim influenced organizations of the International Community.
The canonical Islamic Laws and scripture consists of Koran, Suna and Hadith. Bukhari would be the Hadith in this case. Let me quote from Ali Sina’s book. It should be noted that Muhammad was considered the perfect man, the perfect example of behavior and it was stipulated that the laws of Islam are unchangeable. Muslims are stuck with this.
From Ali Sina’s book “Understanding Muhammad”. p. 39 Rape
Muhammad allowed his men to rape the women captured in raids. However Muslims faced a dilemma. They wanted to have sex with their female captives, but also wanted to return them for ransom and therefore did not want to make them pregnant. Some of these women were already married whose husbands had escaped when taken by surprise and were still alive. The raiders considered the possibility of “coitus interruptus” (withdrawing from intercourse before ejaculation). Unsure of the best course of action, they sought the counsel of their Prophet. Buhkari reports:
Abu Saeed said “We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interruptus, we said “How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among us?” We asked (him) about it and he said “It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exists, it will exist.
Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 459.
Muhammed did not forbid raping the captive women. Instead he made an asinine claim that when Allah intends to create someone, nothing can prevent it. He told his men that coitus interruptus is ill-advised because it would be an attempt to thwart the will of Allah. He did not say a word against the rape of the captives, and by discouraging coitus interruptus, he supported forced insemination.
He made even his god to legitimize intercourse with women captured in wars, the so-called “right hand possessions,” even if they were married before their capture.
What does it matter? Just cut off the offending equipment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.