Is this thing really worth it? Seems overpriced and not worth the money as drones can do a lot of this? Please tell me I am wrong!
To: whyilovetexas111
The US is thousands of miles from where our national interests lie. We have to get there first. The raider can carry drones and drop them anywhere.
2 posted on
08/08/2024 9:26:57 AM PDT by
Gen.Blather
(Wait! I said that out loud? )
To: whyilovetexas111
“Indeed, expectations could be the bomber’s biggest enemy for the moment.”
Second only to a congress that wants a totally vulnerable America...
3 posted on
08/08/2024 9:29:39 AM PDT by
null and void
(I identify as a conspiracy theorist. My personal pronouns are told/you/so.)
To: whyilovetexas111
5 posted on
08/08/2024 9:32:08 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: whyilovetexas111
More expensive and useless as the B-2 has been.
6 posted on
08/08/2024 9:33:06 AM PDT by
CodeToad
(Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
To: whyilovetexas111
A horde of small-nuke-armed drones is a vastly cheaper platform in terms of devastation on targets per dollar. What these things are good for is delivering massive amounts of conventional ordinance anywhere in the world with great accuracy. It’s for beating up on countries that won’t get with the globalist programme.
8 posted on
08/08/2024 9:33:41 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
To: whyilovetexas111
11 posted on
08/08/2024 9:49:45 AM PDT by
Thud
To: whyilovetexas111
No; you’re right.
The MIC LOVES to spend OUR money.
13 posted on
08/08/2024 9:53:40 AM PDT by
Carriage Hill
(A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
To: whyilovetexas111
one Washington thinktank is backing the claim, and urging the US to pursue large-scale acquisition of the B-21. Let's find out who is funding that "thinktank"
15 posted on
08/08/2024 9:55:50 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: whyilovetexas111
I just read an article in one of the defense magazines that says the days of stealth are numbered and so are the days of the B-21. The AF plans upwards of a thousand new drones in the next FY I just read today.
Makes me wonder if the Raider or Northrup are going to last long. Got a bad feeling about both.
16 posted on
08/08/2024 9:58:21 AM PDT by
Sequoyah101
(More important than why there was nobody protecting the AGR roof, how did Crooks know that?)
To: whyilovetexas111
“large, fuel-guzzling military aircraft”
Consuming fuel generates heat. Where does the heat go without generating a trail?
To: whyilovetexas111
Only a fool thinks stealth is viable in the never ending war between stealth and radar. We get a new generation of stealth every 10-20 years. Meanwhile the microchips analyzing radar inputs double every 18 months at least. We are something like three generations into the planes. Computing power is way more than 5000 times as powerful.
See also… battleship.
18 posted on
08/08/2024 10:15:02 AM PDT by
DesertRhino
(2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
To: whyilovetexas111
So many weapon systems were developed for a specific purpose then evolved to excel in a different mission. Look at the ROI the B-52 got us.
Yet the libs scream and yell about the expense every chance they get. I'm sure that started when some tribes went to the bow and arrow after using spears.
26 posted on
08/08/2024 11:04:29 AM PDT by
pfflier
To: whyilovetexas111
Please tell me I am wrong!
—
You are - because the plane is designed to be pilotless as well as with humans in it who could control a flight of drones.
29 posted on
08/08/2024 11:12:56 AM PDT by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
To: whyilovetexas111
Still a lot of secrecy about this plane. For all we know at this point, it may well be a drone.
38 posted on
08/08/2024 12:33:10 PM PDT by
CodeJockey
(I'd like to change the world, but they won't give me the source code.)
To: whyilovetexas111
[...with some claiming that the new stealth bomber will have the radar cross section (RCS) of an insect. ]
Yeah, freakin' Mothra...
42 posted on
08/08/2024 1:30:33 PM PDT by
PLMerite
("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest )
To: whyilovetexas111
This and the Columbia SSBN and the Sentinel ICBM programs are probably the most important military upgrades since the 70s and especially 80s with Reagan. Absolutely required.
49 posted on
08/08/2024 7:04:52 PM PDT by
MarzOb
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson