Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden set to unveil major Supreme Court reform plans next week
Daily Mail ^

Posted on 07/27/2024 1:21:19 PM PDT by algore

click here to read article


Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last
To: Publius

Or as a lame duck he can propose anything without political ramification. Look for this to bring out dem voters. The target audience is the young skulls full of mush to quote a legend. Biden has a bit of sympathy vote. The youngsters will eat it up


141 posted on 07/27/2024 3:24:52 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: algore
Two people familiar with the matter told Politico that the president is likely to endorse establishing term limits for justices, and bring in a code of ethics.

The irony.

First try it out on yourself and the House and Senate and see how it works out.

When the kinks are worked out, then we can talk about the SCOTUS.

142 posted on 07/27/2024 3:30:07 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Show me where in that pesky constitution thingie that the executive branch can apply any rules whatsoever to the judiciary branch...


143 posted on 07/27/2024 3:30:21 PM PDT by joe fonebone (And the people said NO! The End)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Runner

They’re evil, not stupid.

The people pushing this know that they have an historically weak candidate, and they desperately need people talking about anything but Kamala.

Plus it ties into their fake outrage over Dobbs “Supreme Court Bad” has been their rallying cry for years now. Of course, they’re not really upset over Dobbs...it’s given them a huge bump in fundraising and an issue that they can run on in Blue states for the foreseeable future.

Pure focus-group electoral cynicism on full display.


144 posted on 07/27/2024 3:31:06 PM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: algore

Hey Joe, cure cancer. Much easier than this pipe dream.


145 posted on 07/27/2024 3:39:15 PM PDT by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Well, giving the speech at the third or fourth most despicable President to pack the Court is a Demoncrat Wet Dream. Good luck getting it ratified, Barry!


146 posted on 07/27/2024 3:40:34 PM PDT by Shady (The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

I see three proposals in this article.

1. Term limit the Justices of the Supreme Court
2. Create an enforceable code of ethics for the Justices of the Supreme Court
3. Amend the Constitution to remove the presidential immunity recently outlined by the Supreme Court

It looks like only one is looking for an amendment. The other two can be done with congressional legislation, right? And I’m not sure why codifying presidential immunity requires an amendment, except to make it bullet-proof in the future.

Not in this article is anything about changing the size of the SCOTUS, which has been done in the past.

Am I reading this right or wrong?


147 posted on 07/27/2024 3:41:07 PM PDT by CrazyCatChick (DEATH POKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

no he can not..this is just pap for his looney base.


148 posted on 07/27/2024 3:42:46 PM PDT by basalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

Should a congresswoman have immunity to call Netanyahu a “war criminal”?

Can anybody justify that?


A stupid question.

Yes they should, as should anyone who supports the 1st amendment to the constitution.


149 posted on 07/27/2024 3:44:07 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I mean, he does if it’s signing legislation from Congress.


150 posted on 07/27/2024 3:45:42 PM PDT by CrazyCatChick (DEATH POKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: algore

Joe Biden is the lamest of lame ducks. If he does this, its because the powers that be want to get it done with Joe Biden’s fingerprints on it. It’s a set up.


151 posted on 07/27/2024 3:47:32 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdnerds

his base of inner city blacks dont understand this stuff, they just believe anything they are told.


152 posted on 07/27/2024 3:47:46 PM PDT by basalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CrazyCatChick
Term limit the Justices of the Supreme Court

Requires a constitutional amendment.

Create an enforceable code of ethics for the Justices of the Supreme Court

Can be done by legislation.

Amend the Constitution to remove the presidential immunity recently outlined by the Supreme Court

Requires a constitutional amendment.

153 posted on 07/27/2024 3:48:19 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: CrazyCatChick
Not in this article is anything about changing the size of the SCOTUS, which has been done in the past.

Can be done by legislation.

154 posted on 07/27/2024 3:49:51 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: algore
Two people familiar with the matter

Let me guess, that dude named Anonymous and his brother Unnamed Source.......

Those dudes sure get quoted a lot........

155 posted on 07/27/2024 3:52:02 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

FJB
He cannot legally do this. He’s a moron if he believes he can.


156 posted on 07/27/2024 3:52:21 PM PDT by lgjhn23 ("On the 8th day, Satan created the progressive liberal to destroy all the good that God created..." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

“Biden set to unveil”. Seldom does one read a more empty statement.


157 posted on 07/27/2024 3:53:14 PM PDT by know.your.why
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

and the second one would be promptly struck down as unconstitutional.


158 posted on 07/27/2024 3:54:50 PM PDT by basalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Publius

That isn’t going to happen, I pray.


159 posted on 07/27/2024 3:58:37 PM PDT by Shady (The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: algore

Republicans should pounce ...

... and demand term limits for Members of Congress as well.

I would support that. We can debate separately the appropriate limit. I tend to favor longer limits. YMMV. But the biggest problem is the congressman for life racket, which is what has produced the grotesque corruption and arrogance of the democrat leadership. This is much less of a problem in the GOP because the congressional Republicans have been operating as a circular firing squad ever since Newt Gringrich and Dick Armey, who had been a great team through the mid-1990’s, hit their sell-by date.


160 posted on 07/27/2024 4:02:30 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson