Posted on 07/25/2024 8:24:03 AM PDT by Rummyfan
In case you missed it, the mainstream media has been doing backflips: Biden is out, Kamala is in, and Operation Prop-Up Harris is fully underway. Over just the past few days, the media has gone from “Kamala who lol?” to “OMG, Kamala is a political unicorn, the most beautiful woman who’s ever lived, and the savior of our country!” And thus, the Harris Honeymoon was launched.
But eventually, all honeymoons must end. It’s inevitable. Honeymoons aren’t meant to last forever – because eventually, you leave paradise and return to your normal life. It’s true in traditional marriages, and it’s even more true in DNC shotgun marriages – i.e. the sudden divorcing of Joe Biden and the whirlwind betrothal of Kamala Harris: This might be a hastily arranged marriage, but it’s still a marriage.
In no particular order, when the Harris Honeymoon comes to a close, here are the 10 questions we dare the media to ask the Vice President:
“Nearly 92% of your White House staff has either quit in anger, resigned on their own, or been fired during your first three years as vice president – which seems like an unusually high number. Was the problem racism, Donald Trump, or that gosh-darn Russian misinformation?”
“Your first responsibility as vice president was solving the problem on the border. Bravo on a job well done! Which one of your clever strategies that fixed the border will you redeploy to tackle, say, high inflation?”
“Which example best highlights your strong moral convictions: Your earlier admonishment of Biden for making women uncomfortable and cozying up to anti-busing white racists, or your steadfast support for Jussie Smollett (which totally, 100% wasn’t a ridiculously obvious hoax that anyone could see)?”
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
I think the real test is going to be:
Does Kamala only get all prescreened scripted questions?
is the “press” allowed to ask ANY non approved, pre prepared response questions?
You can expect a henhouse full of cackles for answers on those.
Yes, it’s funny to have the snarky questions, but some of them (rephrased a bit) are legitimate and really should be asked, to wit:
“Nearly 92% of your White House staff has either quit in anger, resigned on their own, or been fired during your first three years as vice president – which seems like an unusually high number”, can you explain this high turnover?
“Your first responsibility as vice president was solving the problem on the border”, but the situation at the border has steadily, and demonstrably, gotten worse throughout the tenure of this administration. Why?
As well as the questions around when did she know that Biden was incapacitated and why was she an active participant in concealing his condition from the public, and the question about being an election denier, and the question about Republican prosecutors looking into her support of BLM the way she supported going after Trump.
“At any point during the Biden administration did you realize that the president’s brain was as soft as a sack of soup?”
I could see President Trump or Vance asking any of these.
Kamala: "No, the problem was them Jews!"
The Trump campaign filed a complaint on Tuesday with the FEC accusing Biden and Harris of violating campaign finance laws by rolling over Biden’s campaign funds to Harris. The complaint came after Biden’s team had illegally amended the name of its campaign committee Sunday to “Harris for President.”
What happens to the $240M Biden raised for reelection,
when he was selected in the primary by 14 million voters?
<><>It’s a complicated FEC issue.
<><>Biden’s reelection efforts raised a total of $240 million at the end of June 2024.
<><>Those funds are split across the DNC, allied committees and Biden’s campaign committee, itself.
<><>The Biden campaign committee, alone, holds $95.9 million as of the end of last month.
<><>Biden has now transferred $91 million to Kamala
<><>The FEC chair intimated that Harris might not actually be eligible to access the funds.
<><>He pointed to this regulation: 11 C.F.R. § 110.1(b)(3): “If the candidate is not a candidate in the general election, all contributions made for the general election shall be either returned or refunded to the contributors or redesignated ..., or reattributed ..., as appropriate.”
Dems Seem Nervous About Kamala Maybe Losing Her $100M War Chest
Biden/Harris illegally altered an official document submitted to a federal agency
By Katie Pavlich, July 24, 2024, townhall.com
Within hours of President Joe Biden announcing he was suspending his 2024 campaign for the White House, which he did through a letter posted on X, his campaign quickly moved to change from the “Biden for President” to the “Harris for President” on official Federal Election Commission forms. They did this so Harris can access nearly $100 million in already raised campaign funds.
But according to FEC Commissioner Sean Cooksey, a transfer of funds to Harris isn’t that simple. Election law attorney Charlie Spies agrees. The Trump campaign filed a complaint with the FEC Monday over the move, which could force the commission to at least consider whether the change is in compliance with the law and make a ruling.
“Kamala Harris is in the process of committing the largest campaign finance violation in American history and she is using the Commission’s own forms to do it,” the complaint states. “The Commission must not and cannot sit idly by while one candidate takes nearly one hundred million dollars from the authorized committee of another, in violation of the Act and the will of the donors who gave the money in the first place.”
“If Kamala Harris were a candidate for something in 2024, federal law requires her to have filed a Statement of Candidacy and for her name to have appeared in the name of her authorized committee. But Kamala Harris’s name does not appear in the name of her purported authorized committee, ‘Biden for President,’ and, until Sunday, no Statement of Candidacy existed for her. Then Sunday, rather than filing her own Statement of Candidacy, she merely altered Joe Biden’s to replace his name with hers. There is no mechanism under the Act for one individual to end another’s federal candidacy by simply amending the other’s Form 2.
Moreover, in that purported amended Form 2 Harris designated ‘Biden for President’ as her principal campaign committee and then renamed it. Altering a document submitted to a federal agency is a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1519.3,” it continues, arguing the transfer is, “a brazen money grab that would constitute the single largest excessive contribution and biggest violation in the history of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended.”
In the meantime, Democrats seem very nervous about Cooksey’s skepticism and are doing their best to intimidate the FEC into silence.
Stupid article.
Why not come up with some legit questions for instead of sarcasm?
Circa 2019-—You owe them an apology’: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard takes aim at Sen. Kamala Harris’ record as a prosecutor during 2019 Democratic debate; Gabbard said “there’s no excuse” for Harris’ abysmal record as a prosecutor.
By Ella Torres, abcnews.com. July 31, 2019, 9:59 PM
Democratic Presidential Debate: Moments that mattered from night 2. Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Tulsi Gabbard, Corey Booker and six other presidential hopefuls sparred.
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard didn’t hold back when she took aim at Sen. Kamala Harris, saying “there is no excuse” for her record as a prosecutor and she owed those “who suffered under [her] reign as prosecutor” an apology.
Gabbard, D-Hawaii, was speaking about the country’s criminal justice system at Wednesday night’s Democratic debate when she brought Harris’ history into question. Gabbard said that while Harris, D-Calif., is proud of her record, she is “deeply concerned.”
Democratic debates 2019 Live Updates: Biden, Booker bump heads on criminal justice). “There are too many examples to cite, but she put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana. She blocked evidence, she blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so,” Gabbard said.
”She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California, and she fought to keep cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way,” Gabbard said.
Harris responded that she significantly reformed the criminal justice system in California and she was proud of her work.
“And I am proud of making a decision to not just give fancy speeches or be in a legislative body and give speeches on the floor but doing the work of being in the position to use the power that I had to reform a system that is badly in need of reform,” she said.
But Gabbard wasn’t done. “The bottom line is Senator Harris when you were in a position to make a difference and an impact in these people’s lives, you did not and worse yet in the case of those who are on death row, innocent people, you actually blocked evidence from being revealed that would have freed them until you were forced to do so,” she said.
“There is no excuse for that and the people who suffered under your reign as prosecutor, you owe them an apology,” Gabbard added. Harris served as the attorney general of California from 2011 to 2017.
Many media outfits deny you were ever the Border Czar despite proof that you were. In the last 3 years how many times did you go to the border and what have you accomplished?
Question 11: Where did Willie Brown put it?
“At any point during the Biden administration did you realize that the president’s brain was as soft as a sack of soup?”
________________________________________
Answer: I actually realized that during the Reagan administration.
Would never happen even if Walz wasn't lobbying for VP.
I don't think Minnesota has any Republican prosecutors, we hardly have Republicans.
| “Of all the ex-girlfriends of Willie Brown, how do we know you’re the most qualified to be president? And as a follow-up: When you were in your 20s and dated Willie Brown – who was in his 60s and still married – was it his strapping physique that intrigued you? Or his boyish good looks?” |
Answer: Let me just put it this way - - Size Matters.
Like what? She hasn’t done anything legit in her life.
Excellent questions.
May I add another....."Do you intend to pardon the Biden Crime Family? "
Ask her about Willie Brown and when she was with him “Does she swallow”
She was a known whore. Why do we not ask about that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.