It’s projection.
They assume everyone thinks the same way they do. Ironically it gives everyone else a window into their soul.
Enough said.
Not to mention that they want to increase the size of SCOTUS to 13 so they can load it with liberals like RBG and guarantee the outcome before they even hear the case.
“Judicial Independence” means “voting as the Left wants.”
If Jack smith has a savvy cell in his body he’ll drop it.
“To rule in favor of Trump in such a dismissal is, once again, the end to Democracy as we know it.”
They miss the whole thing here. They didn’t rule in favor of Trump. The rulled on the dismissal of a prosecution that never should have been. So what it did was prop up democracy, not end it.
wy69
They do not believe in the legitimacy of the United States.
To them it’s 1619 nation, all built on racist colonialism and the USA was never legitimate ever.
Jack Smith is the poster child for ending prosecutorial immunity.
There has to be a consequence for his illegal and unconstitutional actions.
He needs to lose his law license and spend time in prison.
It’s not a trfile to abuse your position and engage in lawfare against a political opponent.
She dismissed the case because Smith’s got the job illegally.
Throw on them manipulating the crime scene. Staging the crime scene.
NARA sending boxes of documents to Florida and then calling the FBI that he took them.
Threatening a lawyer for a statement.
Ridiculous.
Those were my exact words in November 2020.
Teehee! I’ve been trolling libstream websites with this: “Have You Heard? Trump says during his next administration he will probably get a chance to name two Supreme Court justices. One of them will be Judge Aileen Connon for sure.” It’s driving them nuts.
It is pretty obvious that she's been working on it a while and wanted to leave as few opportunities for liberal appellate judges to claim "error".
It was also pretty obvious near the end that she'd had it with Smith's arrogance.
Where is the “freaking out?”
Headline doesn’t match the article. Whatever