Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

Baloney, that sniper was using a scope. He was watching him from 25 yards away at most, clearly seeing an AR-15 in his hands. Anyone creeping up towards a Presidential candidate with a rifle in their hands, on a rooftop should be shot in sight.


98 posted on 07/15/2024 9:42:51 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino
Go back and look at the aerial photos and ground-level views of the area.

1. The guy was on the opposite side of a sloped roof, and was far more visible from the rear and sides than he was from the front.

2. It appears that the line of sight from the sniper location to the perp's location was at least partially obscured by a tree.

None of this is really germane to the discussion. The question isn't whether the security team should have fired at him or not. The issue is why the hell President Trump was even standing there at all after spectators had seen the perp and pointed him out to the police.

171 posted on 07/15/2024 10:39:14 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (“Ain't it funny how the night moves … when you just don't seem to have as much to lose.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson