Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yldstrk

The perimeter was to small. Deliberately? Thats a question of whether it was resource limited or incompetence or intensional by the team on the ground. I have little doubt higher ups withheld resources. In that case, the team on the ground does the best it can with what it has. The roof top was covered from the SS sniper position. Should it also have been physically secured? That will be a hot wash topic.


27 posted on 07/14/2024 6:42:38 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Magnum44

Why was a obvious sniper postion, 150 years from one of the world top 10 high value targets, with ladder access left uncovered and unguarded?

At a bare minimum the Secret Service would have a uniform watching standing in front of it if this had been a Democrat speaker.

So all the postruing and blame shift is designed to ofuscate this point. Secret Service ownes the site. What every resources, state, local, federal they use does not matter. They are wholly responsible for security here.


223 posted on 07/14/2024 1:28:45 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Don't blame me, my congressman is MTG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson