While @BBC and @rtenews intentionally lie about a "Russian strike on a children's hospital" Irrefutable evidence that this was caused by Ukrainian air defence mounts

X ^ | 7/8/24 | Chay Bowes

[hardspunned]

A bystander filmed the moment of impact in Kiev clearly showing a NATO supplied NASAMS missile striking.

[hardspunned]

What goes up, must come down.

[BobL]

Most likely the Neocon preference was to take some land from Russia before the NATO Summit this week. But Russia closed-off that plan, so a False Flag was the next best thing.

[JayGalt]

Thanks for posting. The atrocity is disinformation once again.

[wildcard_redneck]

Whoops! War is hard....

[rfp1234]

The U.S. was frequently accused of the same thing in Baghdad, when it was Saddam’s errant air defense missiles that did the most damage on civilians.

[T.B. Yoits]

So... NATO is giving missiles to Ukrainians who can’t use them properly and end up blowing up a Ukrainian hospital.

[marcusmaximus]

KH/X-101 cruise missile, not a Patriot.

[ifinnegan]

“Irrefutable”.

Big words for such a big boy.

Must be true.

It’s irrefutable.

[McGruff]

[JayGalt]

Update

https://x.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1810342867036184654

[Terry L Smith]

with all the technology necessary in launching guided weapons at a designated target from the air, (its come a long way from a Maverick tv guided missile over Vietnam),
to designate a childrens’ hospital by any of the combatants, was a bad choice, and a crime against children deemed guilty by just being there.

I do not care, all combatants are guilty.

[montag813]

Or....Update...

Since the Russian online propagandists are claiming that it was an American Patriot missile or AIM 120 that struck the Children’s Hospital in Kyiv today…

The pictures clearly show that it was a Russian Kh-101 with its characteristic turbo fan engine at the back.

Source: https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1810324834116571268

[JayGalt]

I know. There is a great deal of back and forth on whose missile was involved. IMO it is in the indeterminate category at present.

[montag813]

I know. There is a great deal of back and forth on whose missile was involved. IMO it is in the indeterminate category at present.

Yeah, not picking a side here. One would think site debris would be somewhat conclusive though.

[ransomnote]

Okay, but at the link the missile was photographed in its descent and it visibly matches NATO air defense missiles.

Here's a post I'm about to put on a different thread:

Early reports by some FReepers following the goings on in the Ukraine suggested that the bomb that landed on a hospital was far too small, a fraction of the explosive force, than those used by Russia (Kinzhal). The missiles were photographed in their descent, and match the appearance of NATO air defense missiles given to the Ukraine. Naturally, the Ukraine is blaming Russia, accusing the Russians of targeting a children's hospital.

On X

[JayGalt]

Thanks for the ping.