Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jack Smith Is Willing To Try Trump Up To Inauguration Day; Washington Post Reports
Jonathan Turley ^ | 07/03/2024

Posted on 07/03/2024 10:57:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

The Washington Post is reporting that Special Counsel Jack Smith may try to convict former president Donald Trump all the way through the election and up to 11:59 am on January 20th. After the oath, the Justice Department has long maintained that it will not prosecute a sitting president.

There is also a long-standing policy of the Justice Department to abstain from criminal proceedings before an election to avoid the appearance of trying to influence the outcome.

Smith has signaled that he will discard that policy and that he is prepared to try Trump not only up to the election but through the election.

He is now reportedly willing to try Trump up to January 20th.

Smith has made trying Trump before the election the overriding priority in his two cases against the former president. He failed repeatedly to force a shorter schedule on appeal before the Supreme Court. His arguments were revealing. He suggested that the public should have a possible conviction before they cast their votes. It flipped the DOJ policy on its head in openly seeking to influence the election.

The Supreme Court was not persuaded, though Smith did succeed in effectively cutting the appellate process a bit shorter. He then lost in spectacular fashion before the Court on presidential immunity.

According to the Post, he is not giving up the ghost and is now committed to a trial running up to Inauguration Day: “Current officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, expressed … that if Trump wins the election, the clock on the two federal cases against him would keep ticking until Jan. 20, when he would be sworn in as the 47th president.”

Even with Smith’s continued push to try Trump at all costs before the Inauguration, it could be a challenge. There is a 30-day period before the Supreme Court case is effectively returned to district court.

Judge Tanya Chutkan has been highly favorable for Smith and highly motivated in seeking a trial before the election. That led to problems highlighted in the recent opinion. Chutkan was so motivated that she failed to create an adequate record on these issues. That record will now have to be established.

If Chutkan rules as she did earlier, she is expected to be hostile to Trump’s claims on his conduct falling within official functions. However, she will need to make the record and her decision could again be appealed. The Court left clear guidelines that will make it difficult for Chutkan to, again, dismiss such claims.

Moreover, the pre-trial motions were stopped with the latest appeal. They must now be addressed.

Finally, she pledged to give the Trump team over 80 days for preparation after the appeal, which will be added to the 30 days, the period for the remand record, and the pre-trial motions.

There is also the need for the court and Smith to deal with the Fischer decision limiting the use of the obstruction charges — impacting two of the four counts against Trump. As I have previously written, Smith has various options but could trigger a new reversal on appeal if he follows his signature inclination to resist legal limits.

In other words, Smith’s appetite for a trial before the Inauguration may exceed his ability to force that expedited schedule.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arrestgarland; arrestjacksmith; dojsedition; electioninterference; inauguration; jacksmith; shortdropsuddenstop; trial; turley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 07/03/2024 10:57:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

LOL!

I’m sure he is! As is the Washington Post.

however, certain Supreme Court and other judges say otherwise.

In fact, in Thomas’s dissent, you have the makings of a case against Smith’s illegal appointment in the first place.

Let’s deal with THAT first.


2 posted on 07/03/2024 11:00:45 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

1st of all, nothing will prevent Trump from being elected. Even if he were in PRISON (which wont happen). He could STILL be elected president!

Jack Smith only digs his own figurative grave by continuing this escapade. Because Trump is CERTAINLY going to come after him and the lawfare that was wagged against him by cronies like Smith. Smith may eventually be found innocent, but he will have to spend all his wealth to fight what is deservedly coming.


3 posted on 07/03/2024 11:01:03 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bkmk


4 posted on 07/03/2024 11:03:48 AM PDT by sauropod ("This is a time when people reveal themselves for who they are." James O'Keefe Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Way to SEAL YOUR FATE, Jack. Go for it.


5 posted on 07/03/2024 11:07:37 AM PDT by oil_dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
...if he follows his signature inclination to resist legal limits...
6 posted on 07/03/2024 11:10:55 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Dang, that Jack Smith (if that really is his name) must be pretty muscular guy, if he is willing to continue arm-wrestling a force of nature that Donald J. Trump represents.

He shall be the illustration for definition of “quixotic”.


7 posted on 07/03/2024 11:15:17 AM PDT by alloysteel (Most people slog through life without ever knowing the wonders of true insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Look at this uptight, effeminate, little worm, Jack Smith constantly looks like he has to take a dump.


8 posted on 07/03/2024 11:15:57 AM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Anyone who doesn’t anticipate an election season going out to spring is kidding. As delusional as anyone surprised at Biden’s deterioration


9 posted on 07/03/2024 11:16:25 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Democrats, unless they are defeated, are already writing up articles of impeachment of Trump, even as we speak. It is vital that Republicans take both Chambers of Congress in November!


10 posted on 07/03/2024 11:17:02 AM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Going out on a limb here. When trump is elected, there will be no trial on Jan 19.


11 posted on 07/03/2024 11:18:32 AM PDT by coalminersson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

With Biden’s trouble of being ousted Jack Smith battle may be harder to shove threw the system?.

The snakes are starting to get speared.


12 posted on 07/03/2024 11:20:18 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Trump could just pardon himself the day he got inaugurated.


13 posted on 07/03/2024 11:23:11 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck

I just see a psychopath bent on destroying his object of obsession.

Who gave this SOB the power to hijack the entire country and the life of the President?


14 posted on 07/03/2024 11:23:56 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Look at the little weasel, he has a punchable face if I have ever seen one.


15 posted on 07/03/2024 11:28:09 AM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

One thing Biden mentioned in a moment of lucidity during the debate was that “there were more indictments coming”. I haven’t heard any discussion on that comment.


16 posted on 07/03/2024 11:28:22 AM PDT by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Nothing? Don't underestimate the depravity...and intelligence...of those at Rat Party Headquarters.
17 posted on 07/03/2024 11:28:31 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Never Trust A Man Whose Uncle Was Eaten By Cannibals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

And fire Jack Smith and all his fellow communist executive officers of the DOJ on day one.


18 posted on 07/03/2024 11:29:13 AM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In my opinion, Jack Smith will no longer be a going concern as a Special Prosecutor long before inauguration day.

The writing was on the wall with Judge Cannon, and elevated by Justice Thomas in last week’s immunity ruling, “A private citizen cannot criminally prosecute anyone,” he wrote, “let alone a former president.”

Jack Smith is way out over his skis methinks.


19 posted on 07/03/2024 11:29:21 AM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck

He looks like a fella who has something (other than a medical instrument) up his backside.


20 posted on 07/03/2024 11:31:08 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Never Trust A Man Whose Uncle Was Eaten By Cannibals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson