Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alas Babylon!
"If such is necessary, or other proceedings". That's a lot more than just removing the date. I think the clincher is the future FEDERAL crime Trump was supposedly conspiring to skirt.....that turned the clerical entries into a Felony.

Motive was one of the things that SCOTUS mentioned.

And I believe ALL the entries were after he was President.

11 posted on 07/03/2024 5:28:51 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

Seriously, the law compels him to declare a mistrial based on the SCOTUS decision. If he just does a sentence anyway, Trump can appeal this immediately back to the highest court.

Merchan knows the gig is up.


13 posted on 07/03/2024 5:51:21 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
And I believe ALL the entries were after he was President.

The Bragg gang will argue that payments to Cohen ware not an official act of POTUS. They were not illegal either, but thanks to Merchan's instructions, the jury got it wrong.

24 posted on 07/03/2024 6:24:02 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

“Motive was one of the things that SCOTUS mentioned.”

That only pertains to official acts. Even Trump’s team does not claim that the payments were official acts. If they were, the payments would have come from government accounts, not from the Trump Revocable Trust. So it is not impermissible for the court to consider if his motive for making the payments was to cover up a federal crime, even if he was president at the time, as it was an unofficial act. I’m not saying he was trying to do so, the claim doesn’t pass the smell test. I am just pointing out that the immunity decision does not impact this issue.

“And I believe ALL the entries were after he was President.”

Irrelevant, since the entries were not official acts. There are many other grounds for appeal of this case, but that is not one of them.

As others have pointed out, where the immunity case should impact this case is due to the fact that Marchan allowed evidence and testimony related to his official duties to be used in the trial. That’s not allowed under this ruling. At a minimum, a mistrial should be declared, and Bragg can decide if he wants to retry the case without that evidence included.


39 posted on 07/03/2024 7:31:29 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

👍👍👍


68 posted on 07/03/2024 11:43:50 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson