But good luck getting this past the high hurdles needed for an Amendment. Maybe the Dems will just “deem” it passed.
Just virtue signaling to their idiot base. No way this goes anywhere.
Fixed it for you, Joe.
Rep. Joe MORON.....you go Dumbass!!
It will never happen.
Kind of dense, isn’t he? This ruling protects Biden, Obama and Clinton, as much as it protects Trump and any other president. Of course, Biden’s document stashing from his VP days isn’t protected.
If only the democrats weren’t so stupid. Reagan was right, they know so much that isn’t so.
Having a tantrum.
They only like the Supreme Court when it decides in their favor. If it’s not a tool for the dems, like the F.B.I., the C.I.A. and others then it’s an evil devise for the Republicans.
Just throw your sucker in the dirt and run off Joe, you friggin moron.
This goes two ways, idiot democrats.
If the bill passes then Bill Clinton will be thrown in prison for his order in 1999 to strike a commuter train in Serbia, killing scores of civilians. That was a direct war crime. Democrats will blame NATO but it was Clinton who demanded the hit. He also bombed a medicine factory in Sudan during the Lewinsky fiasco.
Obama and Puppet Biden will also be in prison for malfeasance. Those two are the most relieved that the SC ruled on the presidential immunity case.
Ex post facto much?
Would this guy support that?
-PJ
It’s DOA so irrelevant.
The checks and balances are what matters here.
High crimes and misdemeanors. Congress is the check on the Presidential power through impeachment.
Now follow the new line of thinking, if Congress successfully impeaches a President for abuse of power, that abuse of power is then potentially deemed outside the protection of immunity. Which then moves the High Crime to the prosecutorial system and court.
Abuse of power, usurpation of power, etc. all these actions would need to be “checked” by Congress. Once ‘checked’ by Congress this would potentially move whatever crimes to the judicial system.
In the case of J6, Trump was acquitted by Congress. Therefore it should follow the case being brought against him should be dismissed. This would be the logical following based on the Supreme Court’s ruling of immunity.
If this idiot had paid any attention when studying the Constitution he might remember that Ex Post Facto legislation is in fact, unconstitutional.
New Dorkers gotta be New Dorkers.
Idiot Morelle needs to read Article V.
As usual the Libs. seek to rewrite reality into a narrative that butchers reality. Here they spout out ‘absolute immunity’ to signal that the decision supports dictatorship. This is the picture they want to create for Trump. Reality, however, is no where close to their narrative. The Court’s Immunity exists for ‘official acts’ performed by the president in the scope of his official duties as president. Thus, presidential immunity is ‘qualified’ not ‘absolute.’ What the Court created is certainly not ‘absolute immunity’ in any sense of the word. They are desperately gas-lighting like crazy to shape public discussion in their own twisted way to deceive. Only fools will fall for it.
Does he WANT all Trump’s predecessors thrown in jail? Because that’s how you get Trump’s predecessors thrown in jail.
good luck getting the 2/3 votes of both houses!
LMAO