Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Franklin

Is it Nina Totenberg’s sister who has been sitting on the GA elections fraud case (where manipulation of the vote tallies remotely was demonstrated in court) for far, far beyond the 3 months she said it would take for her to decide the case?

I wonder what is taking her so long. It seemed pretty cut-and-dried. And another election process hangs in the balance in the meantime. Her delay when she knows that another election could be similarly stolen if she doesn’t act could be understood as election interference all by itself, could it not?

The claims that Trump was acting only in his own interest is blown out of the water by that case, and by what was already demonstrated in that court. The only reason the whole J6 fedsurrection and all the claims about 2020 being honest can even continue is because judges refused to hear the evidence. And now the judge has the evidence but won’t make the clear and obvious ruling that is called for.


78 posted on 07/01/2024 8:57:16 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
Is it Nina Totenberg’s sister who has been sitting on the GA elections fraud case (where manipulation of the vote tallies remotely was demonstrated in court) for far, far beyond the 3 months she said it would take for her to decide the case?
I wonder what is taking her so long. It seemed pretty cut-and-dried. And another election process hangs in the balance in the meantime. Her delay when she knows that another election could be similarly stolen if she doesn’t act could be understood as election interference all by itself, could it not?
The claims that Trump was acting only in his own interest is blown out of the water by that case, and by what was already demonstrated in that court. The only reason the whole J6 fedsurrection and all the claims about 2020 being honest can even continue is because judges refused to hear the evidence. And now the judge has the evidence but won’t make the clear and obvious ruling that is called for.


A decision can be compeleed by a writ of procedendo from a higher court. An an attorney will almost never ask for one out of fear of offending the judge and having that reflected in the delayed opinion. The Fifth Amendment right to Due Process of Law is derived from the Magna Carta's injunction that judges must dispense justice without delay, "To no one will we deny or delay right or justice” (Magna Carta: Ch. 40). From this right comes the maxim that justice delay is justice denied. Unfortunately, judges tend to be above the law in our society due to the almost impossibilty of impeachment for a federal judge absent criminal conviction. IMHO, more judicial impeachments are needed, but Congress will not act.
85 posted on 07/01/2024 9:22:02 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion

“The claims that Trump was acting only in his own interest”

It needs to be understood that the results of the 2014 Ukrainian presidential election were questionable.

The official tally winner was driven out of Kiev by massive protests.

Many pro-Russian people in eastern Ukraine, seeing their man getting driven out, decided to try to separate from Ukraine.

War has now been going on over there for ten years.

The US needs to make its elections trustworthy so the US doesn’t wind up in a civil war.


96 posted on 07/01/2024 9:38:05 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson