To: CFW
My prediction: they'll punt on immunity, saying Trump has some qualified immunity but it is up to a trial court to decide if he has qualified immunity for the specific acts he is alleged to have committed.
Should at least postpone any trials until after the election. If he loses, he's doomed.
6 posted on
07/01/2024 6:39:33 AM PDT by
pierrem15
("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
To: pierrem15
I think that maybe the liberal justices might want to find for immunity as much as the conservative ones. If Trump does get in and previous presidents do not have immunity, the game is afoot and bad things might happen to the dems.
8 posted on
07/01/2024 6:42:30 AM PDT by
wbarmy
(Trying to do better.)
To: pierrem15
10 posted on
07/01/2024 6:44:47 AM PDT by
ptsal
(Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
To: pierrem15
The problem with your scenario is that the DC trial court already ruled that Trump was not immune, as did the appeals court. It seems a ruling along the lines you suggest would mean the DC trial can resume forthwith.
21 posted on
07/01/2024 6:56:57 AM PDT by
CA Conservative
(Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last)
To: pierrem15
“If he loses, he’s doomed.”
If he loses WE’re doomed
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson