No it does not. Cases remanded to be fleshed out. Furthermore, they need take out Smith, pronto per Thomas. If not, he will reconfigure a new indictment. This guy is Ahab on steroids.
There’s s/t in the SCOTUS Immunity ruling that says that courts cannot judge the intent of Presidential actions, based on assumptions or hypotheticals.
So, to me, that means that if Trump calls Ga and asks if they can “find 10,000 votes,” then that is not evidence that Trump called Ga and asked for 10,000 illegal votes.