Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

Ah yes, the ol’ “no standing” argument. Handy, that one.


8 posted on 06/26/2024 10:51:02 AM PDT by workerbee (==)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: workerbee

“Ah yes, the ol’ “no standing” argument. Handy, that one.”


Standing requires an identifiable harm, or the clear potential of personal harm, to the individuals or legal entities bringing the lawsuit. The Supreme Court doesn’t issue advisory opinions, and none of the AG’s or others bringing this case were able to demonstrate a particularized harm to them, their states in general, or some nebulous group not yet harmed.


15 posted on 06/26/2024 11:49:55 AM PDT by Bob Wills is still the king (Just a Texas Playboy at heart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson