In effect, Trump’s conviction has been reversed. Poor Joe, he was all set to call Trump a convict.
Not reversed in any way, shape or form. Turley says that case does not fit Trump’s case.
Trying to catch up with “true facts” about this case and its
ruling.
Bottom line, this is not a Trump specific case. It’s different and yet the fact it was ruled this way does seem to apply to Trump’s case.
I could be wrong but I think his case must be specifically ruled on. A different case ruled on though applicable to Trump’s case does not nullify his case (like it
would automatically be reversed while never being taken up
by the Court.)
No...