Posted on 06/20/2024 12:14:11 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
So Reinhardt is the one who authorized the warrant authorizing deadly force against a former President of the US?
Another interpretation is that this is improper judicial interference by Judicial colleagues of a different political persuasion.
She likely knows Trump would not get a fair trial in the hands of another judge, and even delegating pretrial motions would result in prejudiced rulings that would tilt the scales against him. So far, she seems right down the middle.
Yeah, the unfound declassified Ruzzia collusion file. Also files kept under the Presidential Records Act as personal files oh and the GSA didn't want them.
NYT= Deep State Shill
They want it both ways: They want to force Trump to take possession of classified documents, implicitly admitting he owns them, then they want to prosecute him for possessing the very documents they forced him to take possession of and implicitly admitted he owned.
Charlie Savage and Alan Feuer
We know the names of these two communist cretins. Now we just need to know where they live. /spit
In case anyone is wondering, those requests were completely inappropriate.
The bias in the courts these days has nothing to do with conservative or liberal politics.
It has to do with which judges can be blackmailed, and which cannot.
We all know the blackmailing is on the anti-Trump side of things.
This is just like MSNBC or Chuck Todd offering advice to Republicans, you know, for their own good.
Altonaga’s first judge appointment- County in FL was by Lawton Chiles,D-Gov of FL the “he coon” hisself (a machine democrat). Then she was elevated to circuit judge by JEB! Bush, Gov, then GW Bush.
Cuban, Yale Law (and it’s the Yale thing that is that “club” even for a Cuban woman. The club tried to take Cannon off the case— because of Dade County/FL politics, fairly certain. Altonaga has handled some heavy duty cases (Drug wars Carribean stuff. Miami is full of this, like some movie. Less so now- only more sophisticated).
The New York Times’ fascism is palpable.
Merchan has made very little effort to protect Trump’s right to an impartial jury. Is he is lazy, indifferent, or TDS?
There is not a single valid reason for her to step aside. Her rulings have consistently been according to what the law requires. Not all of which were favorable to Trump’s defense.
If the NYT says so you can believe them. After all they called it right on “Uncle Jo”e, letting the world know of his marvels. So when it comes to matters political all shall listen to the NYT.
Totally inappropriate for the judges to talk about another judge’s case publicly.
Bush appointee? That’s not a positive thing.
Doubters that Altonga’s advice to recuse was friendly advice, may indeed be correct...but my point is we don’t know. I don’t jump until I know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.