Posted on 06/19/2024 2:44:21 PM PDT by george76
The judge has DENIED Planned Parenthood’s motion to dismiss our lawsuit against them for trafficking minors out of state to obtain abortions. .
One step closer to eradicating Planned Parenthood from the State of Missouri.
It’s one (sad) thing for a parent to cross state lines to get the child an abortion.
It’s a fughing crime for an unrelated adult to try that.
Should RICO the death cult like the did the KKK.
I tried posting a letter to the editor to the Omaha World-Herald (amongst others) that mentioned this lawsuit. It was in regards to an initiative sponsored by Planned Parenthood and the ACLU which would amend the Nebraska Constitution to allow abortions all 9 months.
Here is the relevant part:
“Allowing only doctors to perform abortions, parental consent, informed consent, waiting periods, access to ER’s, & mandatory reporting of statutory rape, sex trafficking, & fetal parts harvesting are all too “restrictive” to PP (which is now being sued by the MO AG for doctor-aided child trafficking to evade parental consent laws)”
The editor, Rachel Stassen-Berger would only allow it to be printed if I agreed to her edits which took out all my major points. This is what she wanted the above part to say (notice she wouldn’t allow “fetal parts harvesting” to be mentioned but left the commas in so that the list doesn’t even make sense...):
“Allowing only doctors to perform abortions, parental consent, informed consent, waiting periods, access to ER’s, and mandatory reporting of statutory rape, and fetal parts harvesting are all too “restrictive” to Planned Parenthood, which is now being sued by the Missouri attorney general for allegedly helping minors travel out of state for abortions”
Planned Parenthood wasn’t trafficking kids without parents’ consent, they were just “allegedly helping minors travel out of state for abortions”
Notice also that she wouldn’t allow the reference to “doctor-aided” trafficking. The MO AG says that doctors’ notes were used to get the girls out of school. This is conspiracy on the part of “doctors” and PP to traffic girls without parents’ consent. Of course Stassen-Berger wouldn’t allow that to be mentioned because the amendment PP is sponsoring gives the “doctors” the right to decide when a fetus is “viable”, and says that “viability” is when the child has good chances to live without “extraordinary” medical care - which is even more extreme than the NYC Bar Associations definition saying it’s when the fetus can live with or without medical assistance.
So Stassen-Berger wanted to hide that PP sponsored the amendment and that PP and the very “doctors” they want to entrust with defining “fetal viability” conspired to traffic girls directly from school to get abortions without their parents knowing.
It is yellow journalism like this that allows the lies to believed by so many.
One of the many, many reasons I don’t believe the media, not at least without having multiple, unconnected sources.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.