Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

But that issue was not before the Court. If the court can resolve an issue on legislative grounds, it will do so without getting to any underlying constitutional question. The constitutionality of a bumpstock ban can only be addressed if the Congress or a state legislature should enact such a ban.


20 posted on 06/14/2024 11:17:28 AM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Ask about franchise opportunities in your area.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: GreenLanternCorps
But that issue was not before the Court.

I understand.

Still, I have a problem with a Conservative Justice casually suggesting that if anyone wants to infringe on the right to keep and bear arms, the best way to do so would be to have Congress pass some laws.

That sort of advice is not what we need.

24 posted on 06/14/2024 11:20:56 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (It's not "Quiet Quitting" -- it's "Going Galt".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson