Pro-Life Doctors Condemn Supreme Court Ruling Letting Abortion Pills Hurt Women

The attorney who represented the pro-life doctors who challenged the lack of safety regulations on the dangerous abortion pill condemned today’s Supreme Court decision.

The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a challenge to the abortion pill mifepristone, meaning the abortion drug will be widely available to continue killing babies and injuring doctors nationwide.

The 9-0 decision says the pro-life doctors who brought the case do not have standing – they were not injured, and so the court does not intervene. That’s even though they sued on behalf of women who were injured by the abortion drug by the thousands – including women who have been killed.

Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Erin Hawley told LifeNews that the ruling allows the FDA to keep putting women at risk.

“We are disappointed that the Supreme Court did not reach the merits of the FDA’s lawless removal of commonsense safety standards for abortion drugs. Nothing in today’s decision changes the fact that the FDA’s own label says that roughly one in 25 women who take chemical abortion drugs will end up in the emergency room—a dangerous reality the doctors and medical associations we represent in this case know all too well. The FDA recklessly leaves women and girls to take these high-risk drugs all alone in their homes or dorm rooms, without requiring the ongoing, in-person care of a doctor. While we’re disappointed with the court’s decision, we will continue to advocate for women and work to restore commonsense safeguards for abortion drugs—like an initial office visit to screen for ectopic pregnancies. And we are grateful that three states stand ready to hold the FDA accountable for jeopardizing the health and safety of women and girls across this country.

“The court recognized that our doctors would have standing to protect their conscience rights. The government’s initial position was that federal law would not protect our doctors from being forced to participate in abortions. Yet at the Supreme Court, the government changed its position and said that federal conscience laws definitively protect doctors in these circumstances. This about-face explains why the Supreme Court parted ways with every other court to consider this case. And it resulted in the court recognizing that ‘[f]ederal law fully protects doctors against being required to provide abortions or other medical treatment against their consciences.’”

Leading pro-life groups were hoping the case could result in the dangerous abortion pill prohibited from being sold by mail and important FDA warnings about the dangers of the abortion drug restored after the agency removed them for little or no reason.

The case is the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, and the Supreme Court heard arguments that the FDA has threatened women’s health because of its removal of key safety standards in its approval of mifepristone, one of the abortion pill drugs. Four national medical associations, four doctors, and Alliance Defending Freedom sued the FDA for failing to follow its own protocol, allowing mifepristone to be used later in pregnancy and to be mailed to pregnant women without an in-person visit.

The case claims that the FDA should not have approved the drug for use in the abortion pill regimen in 2000 and that the agency has further put women in danger with other changes to the regimen in 2016 and beyond.

During the oral arguments, attorney Erin Hawley argued on behalf of a doctors’ group that treats women injured by the abortion pill and argues on their behalf.

She told the high court that an appeals could ruling banning mail-order abortions and restoring the FDA safety warnings should be upheld.

“The FDA’s own label for these drugs says that roughly one in 25 women who take them will end up in the emergency room,” said Senior Counsel Erin Hawley, who represents the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine.

“The lower court’s decision merely restored long-standing and crucial protections under which millions of women used abortion drugs,” Hawley said.

“FDA’s outsourcing of abortion drug harm to respondent doctors forces them to choose between helping a woman with a life-threatening condition and violating their conscience,” she added. “The agency’s removal of in-person doctor visits and consistent, ongoing care has subjected more women to suffering severe, even life-threatening, medical conditions.”

During the hearing a few justices suggested the pro-life doctors lack standing, or sufficient legal injury, to challenge the FDA rollback of the safety regulations. But Hawley said they have standing because they treat women injured by abortion pills.

“They can’t waste precious moments,” Hawley said. “These are emergency situations. Respondent doctors don’t necessarily know until they scrub into the operating room whether this may or may not be abortion drug harm.”

“The FDA acknowledges that women are even more likely to need surgical intervention and other medical care without an in-person visit,” she added.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett questioned the FDA’s lawyer, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar, on whether the FDA followed proper protocol when approving mifepriston and removing safety warnings.

Barrett expressed concern that ending the in-person requirement to see a doctor before taking the dangerous abortion drug could “lead to mistakes in gestational aging” because doctors would not be able to perform an ultrasound. She asked whether this “could increase the need for a [dilatation and curettage procedure or increase] the amount of bleeding.”

Dr. Grazie Pozo Christie, who write an amicus brief on the case, hopes the Supreme Court will uphold the lower court ruling.

She told LifeNews: “It is alarming that the Food and Drug Administration has placed politics above the health and safety of women and girls in the case of abortion drugs. The FDA, which is tasked with “ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security” of drugs has ignored science and common sense by removing every meaningful safeguard around mifepristone, including critical in-person medical oversight. Regardless of whether one is pro-choice or pro-life, we should all want to maximize the safety of pregnant women. And the FDA has a legal obligation to do so.”

SBA Pro-Life America’s State Policy Director Katie Daniel told LifeNews that the abortion pill often injures women.

“Even when used under the strongest safeguards, abortion drugs send roughly one in 25 women to the emergency room, according to the FDA’s own label. Yet under Democrat presidents, the FDA has illegally rolled back basic safety standards, like in-person doctor visits, even allowing these deadly drugs to be sent through the mail.

She added, “The Supreme Court is set to hear a landmark case brought by doctors who routinely witness the fallout for women and girls who turn up in ERs with severe pain, heavy bleeding, infections and other serious complications – not to mention the trauma some experience when they deliver their own aborted child alone in the bathroom. The truth about abortion drugs is being exposed and we hope the FDA will finally be held accountable for failing to protect Americans.”

Ingrid Skop, M.D., F.A.C.O.G., a board-certified OB-GYN who serves as vice president and director of medical affairs at Charlotte Lozier Institute, shared her reaction:

“Pharmacists, who do not receive clinical training, should not be distributing these dangerous drugs. By pushing these medically unsupervised abortions, the FDA and abortion advocates continue down the slippery slope of chipping away at medical standards for women seeking abortion. This is not health care. This is an ideology that prioritizes destruction of unborn human life and does not care that the women injured by these abortions, whom I see in the ER on a regular basis, are collateral damage.”

Leading pro-life groups are hoping the nation’s highest court will step in and protect women where the FDA failed.

March for Life President Jeanne Mancini told LifeNews: “The FDA’s removal of nearly all safeguards around the dangerous abortion drug mifepristone has needlessly put women and girls at risk for suffering severe — even life-threatening — complications without the ongoing care of a medical provider. Despite the FDA’s own label showing that roughly 1 in 25 women end up in the emergency room after ingesting these pills, the agency does not require prescribers to report resultant medical emergencies like severe bleeding and sepsis. We hope the FDA will be held accountable for failing to meet its own standards when it comes to abortion drugs. Such reckless disregard for women’s health and safety is unacceptable from an agency tasked with protecting it.”

Priests for Life National Director Frank Pavone and Executive Director Janet Morana agreed.

“For three decades we have been complaining about the way in which the government has been cutting corners when it comes to this baby-killing drug,” Pavone said. “For the Supreme Court to consider whether the actions of the FDA have been based on politics rather than on science is long overdue, and we believe the case is pretty clear-cut.”

Morana, who also is co-founder of the Silent No More Awareness Campaign, said recent figures showing chemical abortion accounts for 63 percent of all abortions in the nation point to the fact that more women are at risk every day.

“Our abortion-friendly government stopped reporting any adverse effects women suffer from this drug because this administration simply does not care if women are harmed,” she said. “But we have heard from countless women that chemical abortion was not easy, or quick, or without consequences. This drug should be off the market, but failing that, it’s my hope the Court does all in its power to reduce the use of mifepristone.”

In-depth polling conducted by CRC Research for SBA Pro-Life America shows that Americans do not believe the FDA’s assertions that mail-order abortion drugs are safe. For more information about the dangers of abortion drugs, visit abortiondrugfacts.com.

First approved under the Clinton administration, mifepristone is used to abort unborn babies up to about 10 weeks of pregnancy – although some abortionists use it later.

Along with millions of unborn babies’ deaths, the FDA has linked mifepristone to at least 28 women’s deaths and 4,000 serious complications. However, under President Barack Obama, the FDA stopped requiring that non-fatal complications from mifepristone be reported. So the numbers almost certainly are much higher.

Studies indicate the risks of the abortion drug are more common than what abortion activists often claim, with as many as one in 17 women requiring hospital treatment. A recent study by the Charlotte Lozier Institute found that the rate of abortion-related emergency room visits by women taking the abortion drug increased more than 500 percent between 2002 and 2015.

Another new study from the University of Toronto, “Short-Term Adverse Outcomes After Mifepristone–Misoprostol Versus Procedural Induced Abortion,” published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, found that one in ten women who took the abortion pill had to go to the emergency room, according to Pregnancy Help News.

In 2023, reports surfaced of a woman in Canada who also died from the abortion pill and septic shock associated with it.

A 19-year-old Canadian woman died along with her unborn baby after taking the abortion pill. The tragic news comes as abortion activists push to expand the abortion drug mifepristone across the U.S. and Canada, claiming it’s “safer than Tylenol.” In actuality, the drug has been linked to the deaths of millions of unborn babies and dozens of mothers.

Meanwhile, Alyona Dixon, 24, died on September 28, 2022 after complications from the abortion forced her to seek emergency medical treatment four days after the abortion at Planned Parenthood. Her family is now suing the Las Vegas hospital that treated her, saying it did not provide adequate medical care for the abortion complications.

At the Planned Parenthood abortion center, Dixon received the dangerous mifepristone abortion pill that has killed dozens of other women and injured thousands. The pill has been linked to sepsis, which has killed other women taking the abortion drug, including Dixon.

In England, which began allowing mail-order abortion drugs around the same time as the U.S., new investigations show a huge increase in ambulance calls and reports of coercion and abuse. There also have been reports of late-term babies being born alive at home as a result of mail-order abortion drugs because their mothers did not realize how far along they were.

Coercion and abuse also are concerns. LifeNews has reported a number of stories in recent years about sex traffickers, abusive partners and parents forcing or tricking pregnant women and girls into aborting their unborn babies. A midwife with the abortion chain MSI Reproductive Health recently told the BBC that recognizing coercion is a big problem among abortion providers, and the new mail-order abortion practice makes it even worse.

“Then you take the second medicine, misoprostol, either right away or up to 48 hours later. This medicine causes cramping and bleeding to empty your uterus. It’s kind of like having a really heavy, crampy period, and the process is very similar to an early miscarriage. If you don’t have any bleeding within 24 hours after taking misoprostol, call your nurse or doctor.”

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/abortion/the-abortion-pill

“It’s normal to see large blood clots (up to the size of a lemon) or clumps of tissue during the abortion. But the pregnancy itself is very small — at 8 weeks, an embryo is about ¼ to ½ inch long. You may not see it when it comes out, especially if you’re less than 8 weeks pregnant.

“The cramping and bleeding can last for several hours. Most people finish passing the pregnancy tissue in 4-5 hours, but it may take longer. The cramping and bleeding slows down after the pregnancy tissue comes out. You may have cramps on and off for 1 or 2 more days.

“It’s normal to have some bleeding and spotting for several weeks after your abortion.”

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/abortion/the-abortion-pill/how-does-the-abortion-pill-work

“If you have taken MS-2 Step and you have heavy vaginal bleeding (filling more than 2 maxi pads every 30 minutes for more than 2 hours, passing clots larger than a tennis ball), seek urgent medical care, or call...for an ambulance.”

“You should stay within a 2-hour drive of a hospital for 14 days after starting MS-2 Step in case you have heavy bleeding or complications.”

https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/ms-2-step-medical-abortion-medicine

You are listening to Planned Parenthood?

https://www.liveaction.org/abortion-pill-kills/

What is the abortion pill?

The Abortion Pill (also known as “chemical abortion,” “medication abortion,” “medical abortion” and “the RU-486”) is a drug regimen used to kill the child in the womb and expel him or her from the womb. It involves two drugs: mifepristone (Mifeprex), and misoprostol.

The Abortion Pill regimen kills the preborn child by inhibiting the crucial hormone, progesterone, thus essentially starving the child to death.

This drug regimen has only been approved by the FDA for use up to the first ten weeks of pregnancy.

Risks

Beyond the millions of children the abortion pill has killed, women have suffered severely from its adverse effects. Since 2000 through June 30, 2022, there have been nearly 4,200 reported cases of adverse effects, including:

1048 hospitalizations excluding death

604 blood loss experiences requiring transfusions

414 infections (71 severe)

28 maternal deaths

In 2016, the FDA stopped requiring that adverse effects be reported- only deaths. The actual statistics are likely much higher.

Funders

Over the past two decades, an incestuous abortion pill funding trail has led from investors in abortion pill manufacturer Danco Laboratories and its generic GenBioPro to various groups, location sites, and sponsors behind abortion pill clinical trials and studies which claim to show the abortion pill’s safety and effectiveness.

There is more on the link but that will get you started

“The only health issue that came up during Harshman’s abortion was a blood test showing she was Rh negative, a rare blood type, meaning she had to receive a shot of the medication RhoGAM after taking the misoprostol. According to Thaxton, most women are Rh positive. But ‘if a woman is Rh neg, pregnant and having bleeding,’ she needs to receive RhoGAM ‘to prevent alloimmunization in future pregnancies, which is a condition wherein the mother develops an immune response to fetal red blood cells,’ Thaxton wrote in an email.”

“’There’s a rare risk of [too much] bleeding—sometimes bleeding requiring a blood transfusion’”

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/health-medicine/science-behind-abortion-pill-180963762/

[The information on this thread I posted is for political discussion purposes only. Seek professional medical care if pregnant.]

A lot of folks don’t like to hear stuff like this, but here goes:

These drugs are not unique in that they cause the ab0rtion of a fetus - they are commonly-used drugs in obstetrics and gynecology. For example, some of stuff in a “morning-after” pill is stuff that is used every day in the routine delivery of (live) infants and postpartum care.

Some of these drugs are used in birth control pills and devices - like the hormone progesterone.

(Note: I’m not saying “I like ab0rtion pills” or “Let the girls ab0rt their fetuses!” These are just facts and one reason pro-ab0rts manage to make such headway is that they KNOW that a lot of these meds are used in the normal delivery of LIVING babies and postpartum care of normal, healthy moms. Occasionally they are life-saving.)

Outlawing drugs that are used in every hospital, by every obstetrician, in the process of caring for mothers and infants is a tricky business. Of course, that’s how the pro-ab0rts like it. They WANT for you to rail against these drugs and then they pull out examples of times when that particular drug saved a mother’s life and whatnot.

So, always do some research. You can outlaw a certain combination of drugs but you may never be able to outlaw the drugs themselves.

The moral of the story is, of course: Never have s3x. Not even once! It’s totally not worth it!

Have a nice day, y’all!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.