In addition to what you wrote, Jack Smith isn’t a US Attorney. If he was, this wouldn’t be an issue. I hope we win on this technicality, which was just a dumb error on the part of the Democrats/communists.
It’s more than a technicality. It is wrapped up in the out of control administrative state. An agency cannot just give itself powers not granted by Congress through a regulatory action.
Not to be petty - but its not a "technicality," not.even.close
The Constitution has a clear definition of "agents" of the Federal Gov't and their appointment process. All other Gov't attornies follow this - Why not Merrick Garland with Jack Smith? Because the Senate would never had agreed and his corrupt headline-generating machine would have stalled from the start. Its a huge Constitutional issue.
It literally is NO different from Trump in 2017, appointing me, a private citizen, to go and prosecute Barack Obama, except that DOJ is paying Smith's expenses.
Everyone is DC is so busy sucking-up to the collected power of the unelected deep-state and America's KGB (the DOJ/FBI) it took months for anyone (Ed Meese finally) to even ask this question.
It wasn’t just a dumb error. The fact that Jack Smith was not properly placed as SC, was pointed out at the time he took the job.
They didn’t care.
The democrat party is running roughshod over this country, ignoring laws and rules as they go. They must be stopped and held accountable.
Supreme Court rules Biden doesn’t have the authority to “forgive” student loans....he does it anyway. They don’t care.