It’s disturbing that Trump’s attorneys didn’t raise the question before the Supreme Court and that Clarence Thomas had to ask them why they didn’t. They had raised the question before an Appeals Court, but apparently just forgot to include the question when they appealed to the Supreme Ct. Makes his attorneys look incompetent.
As far as I know the only issue that has been in front of the Supreme Court has been the immunity case to determine if President's have immunity of actions taken while in office. Sometimes they will not entertain a point that is not being adjudicated.
You are impugning without fully understanding the dangers they face. Who knows, perhaps one of his lawyers asked a question that provoked the thought process that led Clarence Thomas to state what he said. It may have come from Judge Aileen Cannon who has been exposing a lot of the information that has been kept hidden by these criminals.
Sometimes I think people just fail to understand, that we are no longer living in the U.S. that wee were born into, or even existed when Trump was President, because they seem to think that rule-of-law is still inexistence, even after seeing all of the lawfare this is antithetical to what is normal.
You are seeing the expose of a criminal justice system that has been systematically destroyed by activism being taught in our law schools and the placement of many of these people throughout our legal system.
They didn’t forget. They included it in the appropriate case.