Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Is Biden Trying to Cover for Iran’s Massive Nuclear Violations?
New York Post ^ | May 29, 2024

Posted on 05/29/2024 6:00:41 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Not only is the Biden administration bent on turning a blind eye to terror-supporter Iran’s world-dominating nuclear ambitions, it’s pushing our allies to ignore them, too. The Wall Street Journal reports that European diplomats say US officials have been trying to talk Britain and France out of censuring Iran at the International Atomic Energy Agency’s board meeting next week, though Iran has grown its stockpile of highly enriched uranium to record highs, on the brink of enough to fuel three nuclear weapons — a blatant middle finger to the West after the IAEA warned Iran to cool its nuke program and allow greater oversight.

US officials deny running cover for Iran, of course, but it fits right into President Biden’s “appeasement at all costs” strategy with Iran — national security be damned. Since taking office, Biden has refused to enforce on-the-books sanctions against Iranian oil buyers, letting the regime amass billions and so freeing up cash to fund terrorist proxies and buy more uranium.

He all but ignored more than 160 attacks on US forces by Tehran proxies until an attack that killed three soldiers and injured 40 more forced him to respond — and then weeks later approved a sanctions waiver that gives Iran continued access to the $10 billion he released from previously inaccessible bank accounts in 2023.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Iran; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biden; bidencrimefamily; bidensfault; dementiajoe; donatefreerepublic; ezekiel38; iran; jimknows; nuclear; obama; obamanation; obamasfault; puppetmasterbarack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 05/29/2024 6:00:41 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Why Is Biden Trying to Cover for Iran’s Massive Nuclear Violations?

$$$.

2 posted on 05/29/2024 6:01:52 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It is simple. “Joe” can’t put his loafers on the right feet. This is the Junta assisting their Mentors, the Mullahs. Barry, Valerie, Ahmed and their Useful Idiocy Enablers who just might get us incinerated.


3 posted on 05/29/2024 6:04:17 PM PDT by Shady (The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

because money


4 posted on 05/29/2024 6:05:02 PM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Why Is Biden Trying to Cover for Iran’s Massive Nuclear Violations?

biden is a Judas.

He got a lot more than 30 pieces of silver.

5 posted on 05/29/2024 6:07:33 PM PDT by HIDEK6 (God bless Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Because Biden is Obama part III, and Obama puts Iran far ahead of the USA in his priorities.

Also, Biden gets lots of $$$.

6 posted on 05/29/2024 6:08:28 PM PDT by marktwain (The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

My guess is that Valerie Jarret has her hand up Bath House Barry’s @$$, and THAT closeted homosexual jihadi has his hand in everything going on in Resident Potato’s phony “administration”. Iran is always protected.


7 posted on 05/29/2024 6:09:30 PM PDT by CaptainPhilFan (I'm gonna pop some tags only got 20 dollars in my pocket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

(Why Is Biden Trying to Cover for Iran’s Massive Nuclear Violations?)

5 words:

Manchurian Candidate Barack Hussein Obama


8 posted on 05/29/2024 6:09:57 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

(Because Biden is Obama part III, and Obama puts Iran far ahead of the USA in his priorities.)

THIS

Like a good Muslim (although light in the loafers) Barack is committed to the destruction of Israel and the United States of America.

Change my mind.

Although Barack often talks a good game, watch what he does and everything else makes sense.


9 posted on 05/29/2024 6:13:21 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Just one thoughtful article on Bath House’s Iran Nuclear deal.

And don’t forget the midnight flight to deliver pallets loaded with cash to Iran, Nobody knows how much much was actually sent but we can bet kickbacks were plentiful.

Obama’s Disastrous Iran Deal

https://www.hoover.org/research/obamas-disastrous-iran-deal

It will increase the risk of war and terrorism in the Middle East.

Monday, July 20, 2015 5 min read
By: Richard A. Epstein
Image
Obama’s Disastrous Iran Deal
By: Richard A. Epstein

In his famous 1897 essay, “The Path of the Law,” Oliver Wendell Holmes said that to understand the law, it would be necessary to adopt the perspective of the famous “bad man,” the one “who cares only for the material consequences” of his actions, but “does not care two straws for the axioms or deductions” of natural law. Our bad man just wants “to know what the Massachusetts or English courts are likely to do in fact.”

Today, Holmes’s quintessential bad man is Iran, as it only cares about what happens if it gets caught,—caught, in this case, developing nuclear weapons. With most contracts, people work overtime to avoid that problem by choosing the right business partners. But there is no such luxury in international affairs.

Last week, Iran and the six world powers—the United States, China, Russia, Great Britain, France, and Germany—plus the European Union signed a nuclear deal called the “Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.” Any examination of this deal has to start with the ugly but accurate assumption that Iran will, at every opportunity, act in bad faith.

The agreement starts off on a grand note: “The goal for these negotiations is to reach a mutually-agreed long-term comprehensive solution that would ensure Iranˈs nuclear program will be exclusively peaceful. Iran reaffirms that under no circumstances will Iran ever seek or develop any nuclear weapons.” But it is straight downhill from there.

The first problem with the deal is that it gives Iran an undeserved respectability that comes simply from being allowed to sign a significant international agreement.

Worse still, China and Russia should not be understood as adverse to Iran, their present and future ally. They are better understood as a Fifth Column against the West, and Iran’s many other foes, whose role in the negotiations is akin to the role that Vladimir Putin played in the embarrassing negotiations over chemical weapons in Syria that all but destroyed Obama’s credibility in foreign policy. Putin will be happy to take any excess uranium ore off the hands of the Iranians. But at the most opportune time, he might be prepared to return it to Iran if doing so would benefit Russia. The Chinese, for their part, also sense weakness in the United States and the West, as they build up illegal islands in the South China Sea subject to our diplomatic objections that accomplish nothing.

The remaining parties are our nominal allies who must believe that this nuclear deal represents a retreat from the basic proposition of Pax Americana—the guarantee that the U.S. will provide meaningful guarantees for the security of its allies. Our allies may well become less hostile to Russia and China precisely because they cannot count on U.S. leadership in tough times. The situation is starker still for the Israelis, who fear that the deal will embolden the Iranians to create more mischief in the Middle East and elsewhere. The Saudis are probably next in line in this belief. And both are surely right.

Iran’s promises count for nothing. Iran is quite happy to fund Bashar al-Assad in Syria, to back Hamas, and to launch terrorist attacks throughout the Middle East. It is eager to confront its Sunni rivals, most notably Saudi Arabia, by supporting their enemies. It is eager to annihilate Israel. Indeed now that the agreement seems in place, the Ayatollah says flat out that deal or no deal, “we will never stop supporting our friends in the region and the people of Palestine, Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Bahrain and Lebanon.”

Why then would anyone be surprised that Iran would be willing to make high-sounding promises that it has every intention to quickly break? Does anyone really agree with the President’s rosy view that Iran will reciprocate our respect with its respect? Putting our best foot forward makes sense with ordinary business deals where reputations count. It makes no sense when dealing with a Holmesian bad man who has no need or intention of reciprocating good will with good will.

In this sort of negotiating environment, reviewing the counterparty’s track record is a must, and Iran’s is far from laudable. Hence the guts of this deal lie not in lofty preambles, but in its gritty details of enforcement and sanctions, two issues which should be non-negotiable—a word that President Obama never invokes to defend our position.

One issue concerns the sequence in which the various stipulations of the agreement go into play. The black mark against this agreement is that it virtually guarantees immediate removal of the full set of economic sanctions against Iran, which will lead to an infusion of cash, perhaps in excess of $150 billion, into the country, some fraction of which will promptly flow to affiliate groups that cause mayhem around the world. But what does the President say about this substantial negative? Nothing. He just ignores it.

In his much-ballyhooed interview with Thomas Friedman of the New York Times, he stated: “Don’t judge me on whether this deal transforms Iran, ends Iran’s aggressive behavior toward some of its Arab neighbors or leads to détente between Shiites and Sunnis. Judge me on one thing: Does this deal prevent Iran from breaking out with a nuclear weapon for the next 10 years and is that a better outcome for America, Israel and our Arab allies than any other alternative on the table?”

In fact, we should judge President Obama and his treaty harshly on each of these points. By providing Iran with billions of dollars of immediate cash, this agreement will help Iran fund wars and terrorist attacks that could take thousands of lives. To offset this possibility, the President has indicated that he will try to bolster American assistance to the various countries that will be affected by Iranian aggression, but none of our allies can have much confidence in the leadership of a President who has made at best negligible progress in dealing with ISIS. His public vow to never put American ground forces in the Middle East turns out to be the only promise that he is determined to keep—for the benefit of our sworn enemies who have greater freedom of action given his iron clad guarantee. The objection to the President here is not that he has merely failed to curb Iranian mischief. It is that his clumsy deal will massively subsidize it.

Second, there is no more “snap back” here. Once the sanctions set out explicitly in the agreement are lifted from Iran, they won’t be reinstated any time soon. Gone are the days of anytime, anywhere inspections. In stark contrast, Articles 36 and 37 of the agreement outline a tortuous review process to reinstate any sanctions. First the Joint Commission must act, then the Ministers of Foreign Affairs, and then a nonbinding opinion by a three-member Advisory Board must be issued. If the matter is not resolved to mutual satisfaction after this process runs its course, any participant “could treat the unresolved issue as grounds to cease performing its commitments under this ICPOA.”

Section 37 then contains a murky provision under which the UN Security Council might possibly reimpose sanctions in part. But the entire procedure could take months, and at the end of this process Iran is free to walk if it does not like the outcome. Iran would also know that reassembling the original set of sanctions would be extremely difficult. Putting this agreement in place will likely end collective sanctions irreversibly.

And what do we get in exchange for all of the added risks we assume? The President claims that we have secured the best path possible to slow down the ability of the Iranians to make a nuclear weapon for at least ten years. But why should anyone believe that that will be the result when we are dealing with the quintessential bad man? The only safe way to slow down Iran’s nuclear capabilities is to do what the President claimed was necessary earlier, which is to knock out Iran’s total production of enriched uranium, subject to constant supervision.

It is all too clear that what Obama has offered today is a far cry from the deal he outlined to the country before these negotiations. It was easy for the President to talk tough to Mitt Romney in the course of their 2012 debates by then claiming it was “straightforward” that Iran has to “give up” its nuclear program in its entirety. As the President once recognized, there are no peaceful ends for which Iran needs a nuclear program. It is awash in oil, and it can satisfy any desire for medical isotopes by buying off-the-shelf products from any of a dozen nations that would be thrilled to supply them for free.

The agreement dramatically changes Iran’s status as an international aggressor. Elliott Abrams gives us the grim tally. Right off the bat, Iran’s nuclear program has gone from illegal to legal. The new agreement lets Iran keep 6,000 centrifuges and it allows the country to continue to do its own weapons research. It is likely that it can do a lot more outside the agreement as well. In five years the agreement lifts an arms embargo and in eight years all restrictions on ballistic missiles will be lifted.

It is often said that negotiation involves the process of give and take, by which it is not meant that the United States and its allies give and Iran takes. Unfortunately, that pattern has been observed in this recent deal. Iran had no hesitation in stating in the eleventh hour that various limitations on its sovereignty, e.g. inspections, were “unacceptable.” Today its position is that the sanctions must be lifted immediately. But the Obama administration was extraordinarily reluctant to say that any Iranian proposal was unacceptable. The drama in the negotiation was how far the Iranians would push the agreement to their side of the table—which is exactly what to expect from any negotiation that relies exclusively on carrots and disdains all sticks.

This agreement does not require detailed study to conclude that it is a dead loser. Nonetheless, the United States has put it forward in the United Nations for approval before Congress has spoken, and the President, incorrigible as ever, has announced that he will veto any Congressional legislation that seeks to block the treaty. Many members of his own party do not share the President’s unfailing instinct for self-destruction. They should join the Republicans to reject the treaty by veto-proof majorities in both houses before the President and his team can do any further harm.


10 posted on 05/29/2024 6:17:32 PM PDT by CaptainPhilFan (I'm gonna pop some tags only got 20 dollars in my pocket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The Chi-Coms are buying oil from Iran in huge amounts— national stockpile amounts— despite worldwide sanctions on Iran for their terrorism.

JoeBama is doing China’s bidding by giving a “pass” to Iran’s nuclear nightmare. Israel is NOT going to give it a pass, hence Biden’s similar Chi-Com instructions on Israel.

The entire Biden family is on the take to Chi-Coms. Period.
Very simple. This was borne out some time ago by Ric Grenell. It is not hard to figure out.


11 posted on 05/29/2024 6:17:35 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Dr. Jill insists.


12 posted on 05/29/2024 6:19:54 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

“ Barack is committed to the destruction of Israel and the United States of America.”

There can be absolutely no question about that.

We are literally teetering on the knife’s edge of whether or not he will succeed in that effort.


13 posted on 05/29/2024 6:20:11 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast (We have not yet achieved peak crazy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Because Biden takes orders from Obama, who takes orders from Jarrett, the Iranian.


14 posted on 05/29/2024 6:20:47 PM PDT by Fireone (Who killed Obama's chef?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Because Iran needs nukes to protect itself from the murderous,dangerous,Israelis.
15 posted on 05/29/2024 6:26:11 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Lethal Force Authorized At Mar-a-Lago!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Because Obama told him to


16 posted on 05/29/2024 6:29:49 PM PDT by nhbob1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Dementia jo is compromised by Iran, China, Ukraine, and probably several more…


17 posted on 05/29/2024 6:32:57 PM PDT by TnTnTn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Biden


18 posted on 05/29/2024 6:36:19 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

Yeah

It may already be too late

We’ll be lucky to buy a few more years under President Donald Trump

If we can survive that long

✝️🙏🛐


19 posted on 05/29/2024 6:36:21 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“Why Is Biden Trying to Cover for Iran’s Massive Nuclear Violations?”

Because John F’ing Kerry’s daughter is married to the Persian amb to the U. N.

F’em

And Jane Fonda. Spit.

5.56mm


20 posted on 05/29/2024 6:41:25 PM PDT by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho have got to go. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson