Posted on 05/28/2024 6:20:40 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
Closing arguments. Your thoughts?
When their star witness is the real criminal here this case should be dead in the water. Decaying in the putrid swamp of lying leftard tactics.
So true! And he’s definitely not the only one who feels that way. The rally in the S Bronx — WOW, it drove the left into PANIC. The ground was already shifting before the trial, but the courtroom circus sealed the deal.
Just sayin'.
Exactly! He confessed to grand larceny AGAINST the defendant from the witness stand! The Prosecution literally suborned perjury.
Like years ago, ‘Where’s the beef?, we now have a clear new question: WHERE’s THE CRIME?!
So far, nothing on the lawfare front has worked well for the democrats. Everything has backfired. So the odds don’t look favorable for them here either.
Exactly! And when even the prosecution can’t answer that simple question, their silence on that point is deafening.
I’ve been wondering about those two attorneys as well. How did they manage to get on the jury? Can they not see the clarity of the problem here? No underlying crime, no jurisdiction, and it is past statute of limitation. Lastly, the feds refused to prosecute. Can they honestly convict and what does it say about their intelligence and integrity as attorneys?
The defense has to go first it leaves them no room for proving the facts of what the prosecution is making up.
Rigging in process 100%.
The defense has to go first it leaves them no room for proving the facts of what the prosecution is making up.
Rigging in process 100%.
“Judge” M says this is ‘the law’.
Is it?? Seems odd.
And, rigged, as you say, Vaduz.
Trump’s had a three-fer—New Jersey 100K, Bronx 25K, and the wild Libertarian convention. Biden, by comparison has the less than dozen attendees in New Hampshire and repeated embarrassing addresses, like at West Point.
Lemons, lemonade opportunity for defense, who could toss in a little surprise and force the prosecution to react.
Thee two lawyers on the jury or Democrat lawyers. They have neither morals nor ethics.
Exactly! But he did manage to take a nap right in the middle of Memorial Day ceremonies. What a PIECE OF SUBHUMAN SCUM.
I could be mistaken, but I think it’s two lawyers on the jury. One of them, I believe, reads the NY Post, so who knows.
All Oaths are meaningless in 2024’s US “Legal” system. That is designed for a moral society. If you even mention morals these days you’re a X-a-Phobe
Not a lawyer myself, but if that’s the law, well then, as the old saying goes, the law is an ass.
As jurors they are not acting as counselor-at-law. Jurists can’t be sued for not following the letter of the law. They are there to issue an opinion, just like the others.
But, just like everybody nowadays, people seem to want to conform and be part of the club at any cost. So, if the judge insinuates that a guilty finding is fine and dandy and stay in the club, guys.....
To handicap the verdict, I say:
No idea whatsoever. I’m on pins and needles.
If the lawyers on the jury don’t convict Trump, they’d become outcasts. Peers and family would condemn them to hell. I’m quite sure they are devoid of ethics or character. Trump can’t get a fair trial in NYC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.