Replies

That warning from Russia is two fold, first attacking Nuclear specific sites can bring a tactical response, second all F16s will be treated as Nuclear threats.

NATO continues to believe that Russia can be defeated or even destroyed by the Ukrainian proxy.

When the US is looking at the smoking Russian retaliation will they be all in for a tit for tat that includes the US being targeted?

Hungry and Italy want no part of EU/NATOs escalating of this war.

The US is run by rank amateurs. Thinking we can destroy Russian defensive Nuclear triad radars under the guise of Ukraine... when o ly the US, British or French actually handle satellite intelligence or missile systems will have to be addressed when Russian munitions destroy the launch sites and contractors.

Why do we need to destroy the Russian "nuclear triad", when we can already eliminate them in flight, for the few missiles that'll actually successfully launch? Russia launching an clear attack miiight slip one into Europe, but that's it. These US is fine.

Not exactly sure what the entirety of the second part is saying, but when Russian munitions destroy what launch sites? What contractors? You mean US silos, submarines? Lockheed and Raytheon? Do you know how laughable that is? Russia can barely get 200 miles into Ukraine, you seriously think they could actually hit US land?

That warning from Russia is two fold, first attacking Nuclear specific sites can bring a tactical response, second all F16s will be treated as Nuclear threats.

A tactical response? You mean nuclear response? See above - Russia can't hit much except Ukraine or Georgia, that's not much of a threat. And treating F16s as nuclear threats? How is that any different than how they're currently treated? Are they gonna try to shoot them down twice as hard now?