Skip to comments.
Donald Trump trial updates: Furious Michael Cohen says he stole $60,000 from Trump as 'self-help' because ex-president slashed his bonus - in bombshell testimony blowing the prosecution case wide open
https://www.dailymail.co.uk ^
| 5/20/2024
| By ROB CRILLY
Posted on 05/20/2024 10:30:41 AM PDT by bitt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: bitt
He {Michael Cohen} finally admitted under oath that he stole $60,000 from the Trump Organization by ‘grossing up’ payments for tax. Donald Trump was seen shaking his head as his former ‘fixer’ made the revelation, confirming he’s a common thief.Third world creepy show trial...
41
posted on
05/20/2024 11:17:53 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(FOX NEWS - Send your breakfast teams to black community restauratns. We'd like to hear first hand)
To: bitt
Da Tupid Judge doesn’t seem to care...
42
posted on
05/20/2024 11:21:11 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(FOX NEWS - Send your breakfast teams to black community restauratns. We'd like to hear first hand)
To: bitt
43
posted on
05/20/2024 11:25:53 AM PDT
by
GailA
(Land Grabs, Poisoned Food, KILL the COWS, Bidenomics=BIDEN DEPRESSION. STAGNATION)
To: GOPJ
What is the relevance of the C-SPAN footage that the prosecution wants to admit into evidence? The corrupt judge has ruled that it is relevant, but Trump’s attorney won’t stipulate to it, arguing that it is hearsay (in a normal trial, the rules of evidence would require a sponsoring witness with knowledge of how it was photographed and what it represents) so there is something going on here.
44
posted on
05/20/2024 11:27:43 AM PDT
by
nd76
To: FlyingEagle
Make it down here in San Antonio, they have 2ays of dealing with ... dirtbags ... down here.
45
posted on
05/20/2024 11:29:58 AM PDT
by
Spacetrucker
(George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British - HE SHOT THEM .. WITH GUNS)
To: BipolarBob
And not just Yahoo; they’re everywhere.
To: marktwain
You presume the judge has an iota of integrity. The presumption is not necessarily correct. It's looking more and more like there's not a single leftist on this planet that has even one moral cell in his or her body.
47
posted on
05/20/2024 11:35:25 AM PDT
by
metmom
(He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
To: Lurker
"What an absolute scum ball this guy is." They'll bring Michael Avanati in to rehabilitate Cohen;)
48
posted on
05/20/2024 11:39:24 AM PDT
by
outofsalt
(If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches anything.)
To: nd76
To: bitt
This NY jury will say Cohen did not take enough.
To: bitt
Jury instructions: “If, after careful review of the evidence, the jury finds defendant’s first name is “Donald” and that his last name is “Trump,” then the jury must return a verdict of guilty on all counts.”
51
posted on
05/20/2024 11:47:26 AM PDT
by
Vesuvian
To: Fido969
Not if he’s prosecuted. He’d better make sure Trump is found ‘guilty’....and it’s enough to keep him out of the WH.
...except it won’t be, he’s the one steering a sinking ship. He made his bed....
52
posted on
05/20/2024 11:51:53 AM PDT
by
fuzzylogic
(welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
To: telescope115; Old Retired Army Guy
If the judge isn’t thinking about limiting damage to his own reputation, I’m sure some of the jurors are. The jurors are all thinking, among other things, how they will personally be “cancelled” if they do what they all know to be right. The question is whether any (or, strength in numbers, all) jurors are more concerned about their own safety or in the reputation of the US as not being a banana republic.
To: gloryblaze
Yes, not just Yahoo! The media is all in on Biden. So is the CIA, FBI and NSA .
54
posted on
05/20/2024 12:04:37 PM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(Why aren't eleven and twelve pronounced like one teen and two teen?)
To: bitt
DID YOU ORDER THE CODE RED?!
55
posted on
05/20/2024 12:06:34 PM PDT
by
Skywise
To: FlyingEagle
56
posted on
05/20/2024 12:07:32 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(FJB)
To: Tipllub
They want a conviction. Doesn’t matter if it will be overturned on appeal, because that won’t happen until after the election.There are two ways in which that might not be true. Nominally, normal course of events, reversal would not occur fast. But that is an extreme case of “justice delayed is justice denied” - so extreme that Trump could appeal all the way to SCOTUS, IMHO, on the basis that no lower court would take the appeal on a timely basis. It would be like allowing an execution to occur while the defendant is waiting for his appeal to be heard. Waging lawfare against the nominee of a major political party is no small thing.
To: bitt
58
posted on
05/20/2024 12:13:04 PM PDT
by
ridesthemiles
(not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
To: Lurker
59
posted on
05/20/2024 12:13:36 PM PDT
by
ridesthemiles
(not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
To: Vesuvian
I’m wondering if any of the jurors will be thinking “Well, even though there isn’t enough evidence about this case to declare Trump guilty - I just KNOW that he is guilty of something bad at some time, so....”
60
posted on
05/20/2024 12:14:24 PM PDT
by
21twelve
(Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson