Posted on 05/08/2024 10:17:44 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 @julie_kelly2
FLASHBACK: Judge Cannon's judgment was correct when she appointed a special master--or 3rd party--to handle the items seized by FBI during MAL raid.
She noted the unprecedented nature of the raid and warned public trust into the investigation was paramount.
Cannon on 9/5/22:
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
“Cannon did the ethical right thing.”
Which was something the deep state could not allow to happen, hence the pushback from their deep state judiciary.
Julie Kelly has done a marvelous job of covering, and reporting on this case also. Kudos to both. 🙂👍
Yes Julie has. She puts mainstream investigative reporters to shame.
But if I remember right- some crooked court ruled against her.
Trump should have appointed Eileen Cannon to the Supreme Court instead of that odious Amy Coney Barrett.
What a difference that would have made. Barret is just another establishment hack (like Roberts) beholden to the Deep State instead of the constitution.
that would have been great but the blessing is that she was NOT there and was serving in S. FLA to take this case and protect the people :)
At least I have not seen them, for decades now. Ones I used to think were, I found out were nothing more than controlled opposition reporters to give the appearance that opposition actually still existed.
Trump exposed them for what they really were though.
IIRC, there was a huge drumbeat to get ACB put on the SCOTUS.
Including here at FR.
“Trump should have appointed Eileen Cannon to the Supreme Court instead of that odious Amy Coney Barrett.”
Maybe during Trump’s 2nd term.
Judge asked for special master to protect evidence.
Democrats said that she was all in for Trump.
FBI and ‘special council’ have done evidence tampering.
The whole thing a setup by government offices, and the White House itself.
It’s all disgusting, IMHO. The judge should dismiss the charges since Trump’s ability to mount a defense have been compromised by evidence tampering.
Importantly, if they EVER had a real case against Trump, why in the world would they tamper with the Evidence and mislead the court?
Their problem is they have no cases, just corrupt lawfare, corrupt ballot harvesting, corrupt lying, corrupt manipulation of the media and suppressing their own bad news. They sure are corrupt.
She didn't have a lot of judicial history to go through. I do specifically remember a dissent she filed on a 2nd Amendment case that I thought was promising. In general, when looking at appellate judges, the dissents tend to be more indicative of a given judge's actual thoughts on a subject, as the decisions themselves at that level tend to be consensus documents, much like supreme court decisions themselves.
In general, I'd say she's been a disappointment.
In his NEXT 4 years-—TRUMP MIGHT DO EXACTLY THAT.
What I recall is people spamming a lot of obviously absurd takes on rulings which showed they either never read the rulings, or can’t read.
We never got around to actually questionable decisions.
I recall that also, but that fact does not make what I posted above not true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.