Posted on 05/07/2024 8:12:39 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Stormy Daniels, the porn actor paid hush money to keep an alleged affair with Donald Trump secret ahead of the 2016 election, has taken the stand Tuesday in the former president’s New York criminal trial.
Daniels, wearing black with her hair in a clip, smiled nervously as she entered the room, walking quickly toward the stand. She put on a pair of black, thick-rimmed glasses as she started.
Trump was whispering with his attorney, Todd Blanche, and watched Daniels as she prepared to begin her testimony.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
“Sorry but Trump not only violated his wedding vows but he made a fool of himself getting involved with this plastic, evil woman.”
By Stormy’s own repeated admission, there was no affair with Trump. This has been documented in several letters and news articles.
Avenatti has now come out and stated that the whole Stormy/Cohen affair was a shakedown operation against Trump. You know, extortion: https://www.denverpost.com/2018/01/31/stormy-daniels-donald-trump-never-happened/
That's why I call her "Big Clifford".
Trump is an admitted “Germaphobe” who had to overcome an aversion to shaking hands. No rational person would believe he’d have sex with a prostitute.
Stormy Daniels signed a sworn statement that it never happened.
But please, go on with your emotionally charged outrage.
“I had my clothes and my shoes off. I removed my bra. We were in the missionary position”
Ahhhh, the juicy bits
>> She is there for the salacious nature of her testimony to hurt Trump politically. Which was the primary purpose of this fake trial in the first place.
Right. And for every unmarried urban/suburban girlboss that goes to JOBama over this clownish lawfare, three young white guys, two Hispanics and a Black will board the Trump Train. 😉
D’oh!
(Michael has already offered to testify for Trump and states the prosecution witnesses are lying:)
Woah!
“I had my clothes and my shoes off. I removed my bra. We were in the missionary position”
————-
So why did you confirm later that it didn’t happen ?
That’s her sworn testimony, it’s up to his lawyer to refute that
If the left is determined to lie about you, there’s nothing you can do to stop them. You might as well call Trump a fool for just breathing. Trump just lost a civil case for “defaming” a woman with a record of false accusations and a story so full of holes that even you probably don’t believe it.
This Bragg case has nothing to do with Trump being foolish. His supposed crime isn’t even about an alleged affair with Daniels. It’s about an alleged accounting error made in 2017 supposedly made to steal an election THAT HAD ALREADY OCCURRED. If you want to blame Trump’s current legal troubles on his “foolishness” rather than a lawless criminal justice system then it’s clear that you’re the fool, not Trump.
That’s her sworn testimony, it’s up to his lawyer to refute that
——-
Agree but the prosecution must not care as they just want to muddy up Trump counting on the MSM to disregard that key point
There’s not enough Lysol to get the snail trail off the chair in the witness stand.
“””Sorry but Trump not only violated his wedding vows but he made a fool of himself getting involved with this plastic, evil woman”””.
Proof he was “involved” with her? Do you have pics? Videos? Witnesses? Anything? Bueller? Bueller?
Well, the DNC got what they wanted.
BREAKING: Judge Merchan agrees with Bragg and Biden’s attorneys saying that Stormy Daniels has “credibility” to testify about an alleged affair, even though she’s repeatedly denied any such affair over the years and even went on record by issuing an official statement denying… pic.twitter.com/yPd1k1JBXK— Paul Ingrassia (@PaulIngrassia) May 7, 2024
I have not bought anything. To the contrary, anyone who assumes Trump is the bad guy in this Stormy Daniels saga has not got the sense God gave an earthworm.
That’s why her feet are so small, nothing grows good in the shade.
How is The Hill getting away with misgendering her as an actor?
Shut ‘em down!
Trump’s lawyers tried to object but the judge overruled them, allowed her to continue her testimony about alleged sexual encounter
Is the judge preventing them from bringing up her written affidavit to the contrary?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.