Posted on 05/06/2024 7:58:59 PM PDT by Texan4Life
The O.J. Simpson 1994 Chase with CGI animation
“If the casket don’t fit, you musta quit” - Zombie Cochran looking for acquittal on dead charges.
“I see OJ man, and he looks scared.”
What did OJ and John elway have in common?
OJ drove a slow white Bronco
Elway is a slow White Bronco
He was found to not be guilty.
No one ever said he was innocent, but the glove did not fit, and the CEO of glove company said his gloves do not shrink.
I am still undecided
I thought Al “AC” Cowlings was driving the slow Bronco??
Are you freaking kidding me??? The DNA evidence does nothing for you? The photos of him wearing the Bruno Magli loafers that left the blood stains at the scene do nothing for you?
Always remember that if it doesn’t fit...
...it might have been the Clintons.
DNA evidence is only as good as the people who collect and analyze it.
Why choose a narrator with a speech impediment?
He pronounces “further north” “ferver norf”
The DNA evidence does nothing for you?
Less than nothing. The blood evidence incriminated the investigators. Barry Scheck absolutely destroyed the blood as evidence, and proved that the samples were mshandled and contained EDTA. The blood collected off a gate weeks after the crime exibited far stronger DNA than the samples collected on the day of the crime and allowed to sit all day in a non-air-conditioned van.
Recall testimony of Dr. Reiders and Dr. Henry Lee, and the cross examination of criminalist Dennis Fung by Barry Scheck. The scientific evidence was dead and buried before Johnny Cochran did anything. The autopsy doctor was so bad at the preliminary hearing that he was not called to testify at the criminal trial.
The photos of him wearing the Bruno Magli loafers that left the blood stains at the scene do nothing for you?
Again, meaningless. Not even evidence in the criminal trial. There was photographic evidence that O.J. Simpson wore a pair of Bruno Magli shoes. There was no evidence to establish that a pair of Bruno Magli shoes were at the crime scene. Bruno Magli was a designer, not a manufacturer. The Bruno Magli uppers were made by a company called 4C and the soles were manufactured by a company called Sigma Gomma. Sigma Gomma sold the U2887 sole to at least 20 different companies that manufactured shoes.
Footwear Impression Evidence, Detection, Recovery and Examination, Second Edition, 2000, CRC Press LLC, by William J. Bodziak
At page 445:
The efforts to connect O.J. Simpson with the actual purchase transaction of the Bruno Magli shoes was never successful.[...]
It is common for manufacturers to create molds for shoe soles, which have interchangeable name or logo plates. This allows the manufacturer to use the same molds for more than one customer, by using more than one name in the mold. The interchangeable name plates can be any shape, but they are most commonly oval or rectangular. This was the case with the U2887 soles samples. When I received the samples from SILGA, I noticed there was an oval shape in the arch area of the sole where the brand name would appear. One of the molds, shown in Figure 15.10 with the oval slug bearing the name Bruno Magli resting on it, depicts how those slugs are changed. The sole samples I received shared three different names. One of these, of course, was the Bruno Magli name. The other soles contained either the name LORD, or the Italian words, ANTICA CUOIERIA. ANTICA CUOIERIA is not a brand name, but when translated mean something like “maker of fine footwear”.
At 445-456:
These names, located just in front of the raised heel, are held off the ground and do not record in an impression on a hard surface. None of the Bundy impressions revealed any impression from this area of the shoe. This meant that, based upon the information provided by the crime scene impressions, the soles (and shoes) could not be limited to only those bearing the Bruno Magli name, but could have been made by shoes having the LORD name, if any of the LORD shoes had been sold in the U.S.SILGA, once again, was very cooperative in providing the names of the shoe companies who purchased the soles manufactured with the LORD name. Although the total sales of the LORD soles was relatively small, it was still necessary to contact approximately 20 shoe companies who had made shoes with those soles, to determine if they had exported any of the LORD shoes to the U.S.
The shoeprints at Bundy could have come from any one of more than 20 companies not named Bruno Magli that used the Silga Gomma sole. There is no reason why the shoeprints made at Bundy had to be made by shoes sold only in the United States or Puerto Rico. They could have been purchased anywhere and worn or carried into the United States by any feet that fit into them.
At the O.J. criminal trial:
There was one other name that they did have that went into this area, I can never remember how to spell it, but it is a-n-t-i-c-a, and I believe the last name is c-o-u-r-i-c-i-a or c-a, and it basically means tradition of fine shoe making in Italian, I'm told, and it was only for the display shoes, they had never sold a shoe with that name on it.
Correcting the spelling, Bodziak claimed "ANTICA CUOIERIA is not a brand name, but when translated means something like 'maker of fine footwear'."
Here the precise scientific translation, after years of pondering it, is "something like 'maker of fine footwear'." Surely, an expert can do better than that.
It is not something like maker of fine footwear either.
ANTICA is not too difficult. Aside from its relationship to antique, in context it could translate to "time honored" or "old fashioned."
CUOIERIA translates as a leather goods shop. Antica Cuoieria may be translated as time honored leather goods shop, or perhaps, Ye Olde Leather Goods Shoppe.
As to ANTICA CUOIERIA not being a brand name, let me help that brother out,
Contrary to this FBI expert, Antica Cuoieria is a very prominent high end Italian shoe shop with locations in Florence and Milan.
"We're a family Business carrying our own brand, Canto de' Ricci, together with other brands like Antica Cuoieria."
https://www.yoox.com/us/men/shoes/shoponline/antica%20cuoieria_d
Shop the Antica Cuoeira brand.
ANTICA CUOIERIA is a classic shoe brand in Italy.
There were only 200 pair of those rare specialty Isotoner gloves made and they were only sold at Bloomingdales. OJ owned 2 pair. What are the odds that the murderer of his wife owned one of the remaining 198?
Slim to none.
Unless you’re just trolling, what can I say? There’s a sucker born every minute, and sadly that’s you. O.J. did it. Period. If you can’t see that, you’re a fool. O.J. owned the damned gloves. O.J. owned the damned shoes. He wasn’t home when the limo driver arrived to pick him up. Where was he? Kato Kaelin heard him running behind the guest house after he came back from the crime scene. The man cut his hand at the crime scene, and failed the lie detector. O.J. was a violent bum who for years beat the crap out of Nicole who predicted that he would kill her and get away with it. There was no conspiracy to “frame him” by planting blood at the scene or by doing anything else.
LOL LOL!
Norm Macdonald riffs on O.J. until SNL fired him for it.
[mishandled and contained (lab levels of) EDTA]
The last thing I’d want to do is let him off if he did it but the EDTA was of crime-scene lab preservation (against clotting) levels - not the level one gets after eating a steak (as you were saying)
He can carve the white meat.
O.J. owned the damned gloves.
And they did not fit. Nobody made Darden make a fool of himself, but he just had to go there.
Nobody made them put Furhman on the stand, but F. Lee Bailey reduced him to taking the 5th Amendment on the stand.
O.J. owned the damned shoes.
And nobody can prove the shoes were at the crime scene. There were over 20 different manufacturers that used the same sole.
He wasn’t home when the limo driver arrived to pick him up. Where was he?
You mean you do not know? That sure is some evidence.
Kato Kaelin heard him running behind the guest house after he came back from the crime scene.
That is the worst make-belioeve evidence fairy tale I have heard. Kaelin heard a noise. He did not see anything. He did not know if it was a person who made the noise. He definitely could not identify any person who made the noise. It is just your vivid imagination that Kaelin heard a person returning fromm the crime scene.
The man cut his hand at the crime scene, and failed the lie detector.
What man cut his hand at the crime scene? Who testified to that? You identify the witness and time of the testimony and I will provide the testimony from the transcript.
Nobody testified about a lie detector. Lie detector results are not admissible as evidence in court because they are not reliable.
O.J. was a violent bum who for years beat the crap out of Nicole who predicted that he would kill her and get away with it.
If only there was proof that he killed Nicole, you would be dwelling on that and not this.
There was no conspiracy to “frame him” by planting blood at the scene or by doing anything else.
They were caught red-handed with EDTA in the blood samples, and it did njot get there by itself. They were caught red-handed with tampered with bindles. Dr. Henry Lee showed tampered bindles beyond a reasonable doubt.
As I said, you should have watched the trial. Then you mjight actually know what happened at the trial.
I notice you made no attempt to rebut the evidence I presented about the shoeprints from the textbook. Nor do you make any effort whatever to explain the EDTA that was found in the blood samples.
And let us not forget the blood stan on the socks. It went right through the ankle area from one side to the other. A miracle if there were a foot in the sock.
Unless you’re just trolling, what can I say? There’s a sucker born every minute, and sadly that’s you.
You could always say you did not watch the trial. That would be a good start. The jury decided whether the prosecutor proved O.J. Simpson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The verdict was 12-0 in the negative. It is not a question of whether he could have done it. When a piece of evidence has more than one reasonable interpretation, one or more tending toward innocence, that one tending toward innocence must be adopted by the jury.
What can I say? You didn't watch the trial but you know all about it. Well, except for the actual evidence part. That you got from TV talking heads or a movie or maybe a losing prosecutor's book. The prosecution was a disaster. Who can ever forget saving the burning baby?
IF YOU HAVE A PAIR OF GLOVES THAT FIT YOU——YOU CAN PUT THEM ON WITHOUT A MAJOR ISSUE.
IF YOU FIRST PUT ON LATEX GLOVES, AND THEN PRY TO PUT ON GLOVES THAT FIT YOU WELL, YOU WILL NEVER GET THE ORIGINAL GLOVES ON.
THE LATEX GLOVES WILL CAUSE ALL KINDS OF RESISTANCE.
COCHRAN was genius with that move.
I WONDER HOW MANY OF HIS LAWYERS KNEW HE WAS GUILTY ???
A mountain of evidence... and you ignore it all. Dumber than q box of rocks. Defense lawyers laugh at suckers like you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.