Posted on 05/06/2024 12:21:11 PM PDT by marshmallow
F-16s are nuclear capable. So are pretty much all modern US and many other nations’ military aircraft.
So are artillery as you said. Heck not hard to look up videos.
Suitcases can be (small or dirty) nuclear capable.
A van (yes like you see on the road every day) can be nuclear capable.
The key ingredient: an actual nuclear weapon.
So yes, like you said, blustering.
Biden has slow walked beans, bullets and some AA capability. As democrats are prone to do, they never take a firm stand but are beholden to so many interest groups and their own self interests that they walk a tight rope between stances that eventually pisses all sides off. They do that again in Ukraine.
They dont fight to win, they fight to win political or personal advantage.
So they have spent money on arms, but not decisive arms. And they have certainly found ways to launder some of those funds to line their own pockets, since accountability is also not a democrat trait.
The daily, “We have nukes, you know” announcement from the Kremlin.
What a bunch of insecure folks running that country.
This morning in Europe, both Poland and Italy stated that their weapons should not be used in Russia and that they will not send any troops.
Macron’s whinning about 1500km from France is a Russian threat with missiles, but when NATO puts them in Poland and planned to put them in Ukraine that’s okay. Macron is essentially saying the existance of Russia is a threat to France - flip that statement around and Russia could imply that France’s warmongering is a threat to Russia.
The US is without an actual president and the donar class is calling the shots in the White Hut. Obama and company have destroyed the institution of the presidency with lawfare during Trump’s term and potato-head Biden now. Somehow they think not having an actual president absolves them of any future responsibility for what happens now.
This morning the British foreign minister was summoned to the Russian Foreign Ministry. They told the British that any use of the Storm Shadow Missles against the Crimea Bridge or Moscow/Russia is a direct British attack on Russia and that Russia WILL make a similar attack inside Britan.
I believe the Russians. NATO is running a business and they rolled the dice against Russia. Russia has nearly 1m more soldiers than 25 months ago. The Russians have stated consistently for 20 years their Red Lines. They have been tramples right up to attacks inside Russia by NATO sponsored proxies, to include ISIS-K which is Obama’s creation.
I fully expect to see tactical nukes used on NATO forces West of Kiev simply if they show up.
I fully expect to see Russia eventually attack NATO countries as NATO ramps up its war against Russia. If I didn’t live a mile from Fort Liberity NC, I would say we have it coming and to expect it.
Putting a Black Lloyd Austin in charge of the Pentagon and starting a nuclear war involving all the White Nations on Earth certianly fits the Racist Anti-White narrative from the Democrats and Globalists.
The DNC is pushing this war. They don’t nuke the cornfields, so to speak, the nuke the cities. I can forever see the democrats having to come up with a new power base at this war, as I am optimistic they would never have the presidency with NYC, Chicago, Atlanta, Seattle, Philly, Baltimore.
While you make a few good points, the silly things in your post stem from this.
Dead democrats continue to vote.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGVrFxEzbM4&t=1351s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3EXCbdb47s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3CxDtU8oCU
Hi.
Not good.
This situation will get out of control, it will get so out of control we will be lucky to live through it. Maybe.
5.56mm
I believe Russia will destroy the airbases from which the F16s take off and land if used against Russia from NATO countries. You can bank on this. They have stated they will do this and I believe them. This morning the Defense Ministry stated they are preparing to use tactical nukes on NATO forces West of Kiev.
"I'm thinking about it."
Vietnam “started” because JFK sent in 16,000 troops, the advisors were doing their thing for the previous 13 years under 3 different presidents including Truman and 2 terms of Eisenhower.
“”””This morning the Defense Ministry stated they are preparing to use tactical nukes on NATO forces West of Kiev.””””
So the nuclear attack is imminent, what do you think, a week or two?
well, the planes can and do carry nukes for USAF
and I understand several additional air forces
” To fly the F-16s against Russia they will have to take off from NATO bases. Without question those bases will be destroyed after the first sortie. “
I think that is the plan. “Ukrainian” F-16s flying form NATO countries are to achieve the results that the “No Fly Zone” was proposed in 2022 - get NATO involved directly.
Are you suggesting those “advisors” had nothing to do with keeping alive and eventually contributing to the US increased participation? Really?
Read my post, having advisors in Vietnam through multiple administrations did not get us into the war, sending in 16,000 troops did that.
We have advisors all over the world and have for generations, they aren’t what causes a President to launch into a war.
All communists sound the same. Putin, Xi, Norkboy, Biden...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.