Posted on 05/06/2024 5:29:09 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
After more than two years of fighting against return-to-office mandates, workers are fed up with their bosses’ inflexible policies and are taking their battle to court.
Zacchery Belval, a designer from Connecticut who has congenital heart disease and severe anxiety, was fired after refusing to return to the office. Despite submitting several doctor’s notices about his medical need to work from home, his employer denied his request citing in-person job duties. Now, he’s suing the company in the U.S. District Court of Connecticut.
“They just said either you come back … or you’re fired,” Belval said. “It was literally screaming matches with management every day saying, ‘Hey, this is about health,’ and management going, ‘We don’t care.’” As companies across the United States increasingly take a hard-line stance on office mandates, an increasing number of workers are elevating their complaints to court and federal labor agencies like the National Labor Relations Board and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Workers argue that mandates can be unjust, discriminate against people with disabilities and is a retaliatory action against unionization efforts. Employers that have backtracked from flexible work argue that being in the office is necessary as it improves company culture, collaboration and productivity. The outcomes of these cases could be critical and force employers to reevaluate their policies, some lawyers say.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
So you are effectively extending your weekend.
Even if I were to return to the office, my job would still be technically remote as the computers I do work on exist on a different floor than where my desk used to be (they have remodeled my workplace so I don't even have a place to go to anymore).
As a result, it's better for everyone if I just stay here and work.
Too many people see Friday/Monday as part of the weekend.
The days of employers getting everything they demand are over, people are much more likely to quit than they were in the past if reasonable accommodations aren't made. I for one am glad of it, for far too long employers have been able to treat employees like crap for peanut wages. The dynamics have changed and people are much more willing to tell them to stuff it than they were in the past.
If management believes that in-office work is more productive, that is their policy. You’re welcome to refuse, they’re welcome to fire you. They can change their mind as they wish, it is ‘at will’ employment. The company has the right to determine their policy.
That said, firing somebody because of a health issue is an outlier case that shouldn’t be used to justify the norm, it should be handled on an individual case basis.
Lawyers overreaching imho.
It also insulates us from those who get offended at the smallest conservative belief.
That’s another issue: Many employees moved while WFH during covid. Now the companies want them to move back. No thanks.
Mental well being was another result of the clot shots.
IIRC Francisco Scaramanga “The Man with the Golden Gun” was one of the few Bond villains who could mostly WFH.
Here’s some numbers about deaths in the home;
https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/home-and-community/deaths-in-the-home/introduction/
BS numbers or not, I’m pretty sure that insurers pay attention to them.
It is not for everybody but too much management is too lazy to figure out who is and who is not suited to it. Thus, the mandates.
I actually know people who are so productive that juggle two WFH jobs. Neither employer knows about the other. They are different industries so if they are getting the work done, I don't see the problem. Some would disagree.
“There are just as many studies saying they can do their jobs just as well if not better from home as there are saying the opposite.”
Then remote learning should be just as effective as doing it in person. And it IS - for a small minority. For most? No.
Ain’t HIPPA grand?
If I’m the boss and this guy is trying to sue, I’d love to see the medical records and if his claim is actually legitimate. Or did he find a sympathetic doctor that produced some documents. There are plenty of doctors that will give you ‘sick note’.
I’m not what ‘crippling anxiety’ is, but once again, find another sympathetic doctor, a psychiatrist, to whip up some nonsense and provide a sick note.
Boss has to pay bills on a office that isn’t being used. Cut the clowns pay to help cover the rent, utilities, etc.
I tried it for 2 yeas wit URRR. The downside is you will be passed over for promotions on a regular basis. Out of site, out of mind.
I never was, but I worked for a small company that was well aware of contributions. My current employer is much larger, but my manager is also aware of my contributions.
“they could get their work done just as well from home”
The “just as well” part seems to be an issue. Employers I’ve known via church, Tea Party, etc., have said that the work done by from-home people (generally) is half-assed. A common thread, too, is that they were trouble makers when in the office, too.
Me ... been retired since 2008, and I guess I don’t really care how they work it out. Covid caused many problems, and there were positive unintended (by government) consequences, too. Move toward home schooling is one.
I wouldn't be so quick to equate the two. No doubt some will take the opportunity to goof off. Others who are freed from the long commutes and the distractions of being in the office will be more productive.
Agreed.
I’ve worked remotely for over 20 years—if I don’t perform my services will not be required.
Fact is for a lot of us there is no 9-5—I’m basically available if needed from the time I get up until I am asleep and when i travel I usually put in 14+ hour days.
Ditto. Youngsters know how to negotiate WFH...
[[. They were hired for office work]]
Exactly! Who gives a rip if the workers don’t want to go back- fire em and hire office workers Instead if they refuse.
Hope the co panties don’t cave in like the universities are and capitulate to the demands of the workers. The workers do not run the company, the boss does, and when the boss says back to work, that’s it- either go back to work of find another job
You are assuming that workers are commodities.
The worker leaves and finds another job. What does the employer do? Finds, interviews, hires, onboards, trains and then waits for that new employee to gain the experience the old one has in order to get productivity just back to where it was, never mind any improvement.
All those steps above cost money. You cannot just plug in a new body into a skilled position and expect equal results. Heck, I'm working with newly hired people who are quite intelligent, skilled, and willing, and it still takes months to get them up to speed on the job.
Basically, it's not as easy as you make it out to be, and workers do indeed have a say in how companies are run--at least they do in the better run companies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.