Argued: September 21, 2023 Decided: April 29, 2024
Before DIAZ, Chief Judge, WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, KING, GREGORY, AGEE, WYNN, THACKER, HARRIS, RICHARDSON, QUATTLEBAUM, RUSHING, HEYTENS, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Gregory wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge Diaz, Judge King, Judge Wynn, Judge Thacker, Judge Harris, Judge Heytens, and Judge Benjamin joined.
Judge Richardson wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Judge Wilkinson, Judge Niemeyer, Judge Quattlebaum joined, and in which Judge Agee and Judge Rushing joined except for part II.A.3.
Judge Wilkinson wrote a dissenting opinion.
Judge Quattlebaum wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Judge Agee, Judge Richardson, and Judge Rushing joined.
Maybe I read it wrong?
“But it is one that they are entitled to perform without premature judicial interference.”
Experimental human atrocity on kids is to be permitted until it is explicitly outlawed?
Weird how that threshold fails in every other form of medical care.
Where is that in the Constitution?
I’m fine with “Gender Affirming Medical Procedures”...
Asa long as it is just a DNA test: if it turns out it is XX chromosomes, then you are affirmed as female, if it is XY you are affirmed as male.
Forcing the cost of health insurance much higher. Meaning that critical treatments will not be affordable.
But try getting dental work covered on either Medicaid or Medicare.
Then I guess they also think 12 year olds should drink, smoke
in public, and be welcomed into sex orgies.
Of course that ignores the 5-11 year olds.
What the hell are these justices drinking, smoking, or
shooting up?
Which penumbra of the Constitution covers trannys?