Forcing someone to use preferred pronouns is a violation of the first amendment.
BINGO. Compelling speech may be more egregious than limiting it.
I'm so old I remember when the Dims assured us that allowing two gay adults to call themselves "married" wouldn't lead to forcing the rest of us to call them that. Nor, they said, would it lead to the other slippery slope problems that Christians warned about.
Now we're there.
“Forcing someone to use preferred pronouns is a violation of the first amendment.”
Ah, but.. even though all are equal, some are more equal than others, you see. And the preferred idiots that demand preferred pronouns are more equal to this current government than you are.
The left attempt to get around it by claiming that folks who don’t use a person’s fictitious made up nonsense pronoun, are committing “hate crimes”
Exactly. These people are literally insane.
Only way this can possibly work is requiring the mentally ill that require a special identifier be used under penalty of law is to also require these idiots have all their expected pronouns be visibly apparent to everyone. Failing to notify the public of every name you go by should also be forced by law if using them is forced. Maybe require their special pronouns be tattooed on their foreheads.