Posted on 04/27/2024 6:15:05 AM PDT by karpov
I would suggest parents pummel anyone who tries to enforce this policy. Quickly and with malice, shut it down. Don’t look back.
It's the consequence of tolerating a stolen election, can we tell the truth here?
Just say no.
It is time to trash the Federal Dept of Ed and every regulation that comes from it. Education is best handled by and within the states, with no federal meddling. Conservatives should not think they will improve things in the long run by keeping and using the federal Department of Ed powers differently. That power itself is the harm.
When did we or even congress vote for this insanity?
This, of course, is evil.
All it takes to fix this crap is for one State to MANDATE all Federal Employee’s and Officers of the Court in their State send their minor children to the Public School System for their primary education, All acts of Non Compliance and the children are REMOVED from the family home and put in to Foster Care so they can receive a Proper Education.
Freedom is slavery. Ours is not to question but to obey. Does anyone doubt that the fascists are in charge?
Just say “Don’t”.
Doesn’t this simply prove that public schools and a department of education are also political instruments?
Is any of this really “for the children?”
Everything politicians have control over becomes part of their game. That’s why you should want government as small as possible, decentration, private business running these services, and a customer who is paying you in control. When government runs things like your health care today, you still pay, but you no longer have control.
Meaning gender fluidity, which renders such to be a Protected Class, based upon feelings and practices, not non-moral aspects such as race, color, etc.
American ecucational systems all have a needle in their arm called, “The US Government”
Until they get rid of it, they will NEVER have control of their childrens’ education
Every single girl (real girls) should boycott women’s sports at all levels until they ban all biological males, or unicorns, or any other mythical creature that the liberals invent.
florida and texas have already announced the bidenistas can go pound sand: they will ignore the new title ix regs ...
Just say no.
A ‘Presidential rule’ is not law. That said, it’ll be a thin veil for forcing perversion onto kids by the eager-to-implement *government* school system (note: I *never* say ‘public’ school system).
This is GOVERNMENT IMPOSED IDEOLOGY. Nothing less. It is the reverse result of taking God out of the classroom. Now the ideology that is the residual of ‘no God’ is imposed onto kids - under the banner of ‘not religion’.
There is no such thing as ‘irreligious’ - there’s only ideology from religion, in various forms, or that which is derived from no religion...which is no different.
Your ground-up ideology taught to kids will drive the behavior of your culture. We are CLEARLY off track.
It’s as though the globe needs to have a ‘results of ideology’ decision. God or no God being a basis of culture and law? If no God, how can you logically define morals, ethics, and by extension law? If God, from which religion? Why? What is the ‘means to an end’? And what is the end?
We’re swimming in chaos.
"The Biden administration’s new Title IX rules mean that all American public schools must operate on the fundamental falsehood of gender ideology."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Respectfully to freeper parents, if concerned, hopeful Trump 47 parents were making sure that their local schools are teaching their children the federal government's constitutionally limited powers as the drafters of the Constitution had intended for those powers to understood, then children would be able to give great hope to their oppressed parents concerning unconstitutional Title IX with the following analysis.
First, if corrupt Congress had removed likewise corrupt OBiden from office by now, either for a number of impeachable offenses imo, or under the 25th Amendment, then OBiden wouldn't be shoving unconstitutional Title IX down our throats. So patriot voters need to give worthless Congress the boot in November along with OBiden.
Majority in new poll say Biden, most members of Congress don’t deserve new term: Gallup (2.2.24)
Voters Doubt Biden’s Leadership and Favor Trump, Times/Siena Poll Finds (3.2.24)
70% of New York voters say Biden not fit to serve another term: poll (2.20.24)
Regarding what the public schools are teaching, not only had both President Thomas Jefferson, in a State of the Union address, also Justice Joseph Story, indicated that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the federal government the specific power to dictate, regulate, tax and spend in the name of INTRAstate schooling, but probably most of the vote-buying Civil Rights Act of 1964 (CRA64) and its titles are unconstitutional imo.
"The great mass of the articles on which impost is paid is foreign luxuries, purchased by those only who are rich enough to afford themselves the use of them. Their patriotism would certainly prefer its continuance and application to the great purposes of the public education, roads, rivers, canals, and such other objects of public improvement as it may be thought proper to add to the constitutional enumeration of federal powers [emphasis added].” —Thomas Jefferson: 6th Annual Message, 1806." (Jefferson is indicating that Congress cannot tax and spend in the name of intrastate infrastructure imo.)
"The power to regulate manufactures is no more confided to congress, than the power to interfere with the systems of education, the poor laws, or the road laws of the states [emphasis added]." —Justice Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution 2, 1833.
Importantly, note that any "federal" funding that OBiden Administration threatens schools with for non-compliance with Title IX are arguably state revenues (citizen's wallets) that should never have left the states in the first place. The federal government, facilitated by its abuse (imo) of repealable 16th Amendment powers (direct taxes), steals state revenues and citizen's wallets by means of unconstitutional federal taxes, taxes that Congress cannot reasonably justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers and a few other constitutionally enumerated expenses.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"16th Amendment : The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived [emphasis added], without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
Regarding CRA64 and its titles, the only race and sex-based personal protections that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect limits the laws that the federal government can make on these social concerns to the context of voting rights problems, evidenced by the 15th and 19th Amendments.
"15th Amendment:
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
"19th Amendment:
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.
The key question is this parents. What is your threshold of "pain" to support Trump with a new patriot Congress so that he won't be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term in office, the new Congress also supporting Trump to quickly finish draining the swamp.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.