Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on Trump Immunity Claim and the Liberal Justices Are Floating Absurd Hypotheticals, ‘Order Assassinations’ – ‘Kill a Rival’ – ‘Orders Coup’ (AUDIO)

The Gateway Pundit ^ | April 25, 2024 | Cristina Laila

[ModelBreaker]

Orders a coup.

>> I supposed color revolutions in other countries don’t count? Does trying to unseat a sitting president with lies and perjured testimony count? How about starting the process of wiretapping a sitting president for political reasons. Oh, that’s right, Obama’s motives can’t be impure. He’s the blessed Obama.

>> Assassinates someone

Obama’s motives were pure. So that’s OK too.

>> Sics the IRS on political opponents?

Same ol’ same ol’.

[Verginius Rufus]

Vince Foster and Ron Brown may have been killed on the Clintons' orders...but they weren't really rivals, just people who might reveal embarrassing information.

Wendell Willkie, FDR's opponent in 1940, died during FDR's third term, but no one has accused FDR of causing his death. Likewise, Robert Taft, Eisenhower's opponent for the Republican nomination in 1952, died during Eisenhower's first term, but no one suspects Ike of causing his death.

Lincoln didn't try to have any of his 1860 or 1864 opponents killed.

If Biden does succeed in having Trump killed, it will be a first in US history.

[SpaceBar]

This whole issue is a monstrous double-edged sword. If they rule against Trump, then all living former presidents should sweat. Think President Kamala Harris dragging say Bill Clinton (who didn’t send a check that year) into court for his involvement in Yugoslavia. Think it can’t happen?

[isthisnickcool]

Biden isn’t doing a damn thing; Obama is and has been for years.

[laplata]

Good thinking.

[laplata]

A coup in another country.

[taxcontrol]

Need a hypothetical?

What if a sitting President is part of a conspiracy to commit election fraud or interferes with the election by using lawfare to bring unsupported charges?

[ETCM]

This ridiculous strategy was laid out in January by Biden Judge Florence Pan of the DC Court of Appeals, who asked Trump’s lawyer “Could a president who ordered S.E.A.L. Team 6 to assassinate a political rival, not impeached, would he be subject to criminal prosecution?”

Trump’s lawyer answered “If he were impeached and convicted first, my answer is a qualified yes, there is a political process that would have to occur first.”

[ETCM]

Think President Kamala Harris dragging say Bill Clinton (who didn’t send a check that year) into court for his involvement in Yugoslavia. Think it can’t happen?

Or prosecuting a former President for "Genocide in Gaza". There is already a sizable movement in the Hamas wing of the Democrat party that are calling him Genocide Joe.

[JoSixChip]

“absolutely immune”

I don't understand you people, are you really that ignorant? No one is saying a POTUS has “absolutely immune”. What they are saying is that impeachment or the 25th amendment are the only avenues to prosecute or remove a POTUS. The only time you can prosecute a POTUS in the courts is after he/she has been impeached and convicted in the senate.

[bk1000]

Here’s a thought: whatever you do to Trump, we will do to you.

[combat_boots]

Repeat ad nauseum

[Vaduz]

Liberal Justices Are Floating Absurd Hypotheticals, ‘Order Assassinations’ – ‘Kill a Rival’

Well they won’t have a problem getting the JFK assassination records released huh?.

[scouter]

I actually agree with you on that. All I’m saying is that it was a legitimate line of questioning.

[Irish Eyes]

Bookmark

[sauropod]

Sure does.

BLOAT.

[carcraft]

A tubal Obama order the assassination of two American citizens with out due process, spied on Trump campaign and I believe at some point we will find out Obama was behind cross fire Hurricane. The quest about assassination is not hypothetical.

[ptsal]

Bkmk

[Darksheare]

They aren’t hypotheticals, they’re what dems are actually doing.

[dandiegirl]

He got away with a lot of things.