To: volare737
Johnson had no leverage. At least 85% of the House — including most of those who voted against this stupid bill — are fully on board with the foreign/corporate welfare agenda.
11 posted on
04/24/2024 10:00:01 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
To: Alberta's Child
I disagree.
He should have insisted on national security FIRST, and let those that did not believe in national security being our highest priority--go "on the record" by voting against a border security bill first!
He had incredible leverage there, and totally wasted it.
15 posted on
04/24/2024 10:05:39 AM PDT by
volare737
(Diversity is something to be overcome, not celebrated.)
To: Alberta's Child
Johnson could have let the the RINOs that support this introduce a discharge petition and bring this to floor without his consent.
Johnson that one the promised he wouldn't bring the bill to the floor without a deal on the border.
So, he absolutely owns this bill.
And, I don't believe 85% of the House Republicans supported aid to Ukraine. I believe half voted against aid to Ukraine.
16 posted on
04/24/2024 10:06:36 AM PDT by
Kazan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson