Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeganC
SCOTUS is unlikely to uphold noncompete agreements because they’re usually one sided agreements that provide no benefit to separated employees.

SCOTUS would not rule on the merits of noncompete agreements.

SCOTUS would rule on the constitutionality of having a Federal agency impose its will on matters of law that are reserved to the states. And contract law is absolutely a state matter, not a Federal one.

34 posted on 04/24/2024 7:43:46 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

“SCOTUS would rule on the constitutionality of having a Federal agency impose its will on matters of law that are reserved to the states. And contract law is absolutely a state matter, not a Federal one.”

1. SCOTUS and any other Federal court will generally rule on whatever the hell they want to.

2. SCOTUS might not rule directly on contract law but where contract law violates established civil rights then they will.


39 posted on 04/24/2024 7:54:47 AM PDT by MeganC ("Russians are subhuman" - posted by Kazan 8 March 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson