Posted on 04/23/2024 8:54:00 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
S&P Global Ratings announced yesterday that it was changing its outlook on San Francisco's debt from stable to negative.
The outlook on the city-county’s outstanding general obligation and appropriation debt was cut to negative from stable this week by the ratings company. The weakness in the city’s commercial real estate market and tourism activity were factors that drove the move, S&P said. Adding to the city’s burdens, San Francisco’s budget expenditures outpaced revenue growth in fiscal 2023.
To be clear, the ratings agency hasn't downgraded the city's credit rating, which is still at "AAA," the highest possible. A downgrade in the credit rating would increase the city's costs to borrow money, but that hasn't happened yet. The change in outlook is a sign that the agency believes the city is going to struggle in the near term.
San Francisco is projected to face a $245 million budget deficit in the coming fiscal year and a $555 million deficit in the following year. The shortfall could balloon to more than $1 billion by 2027 if expenditures continue to outpace revenue growth.
S&P said in a release that it believes that San Francisco’s “management will be challenged to make the cuts needed to restore it to budgetary balance during the outlook horizon, which could lead to rating pressure if the city’s general fund reserves decline precipitously.”
S&P is not the first ratings agency to make this move. Moody's did the same thing last summer.
The outlook on the city-county’s Aaa credit rating was cut to negative from stable this week by Moody’s Investors Service. The ratings company said prolonged weakness in the city’s commercial real estate market and the “stubbornly slow” rebound of office workers were factors that drove the move.
A big part of the problem is commercial real estate which accounts for the majority of the city's tax revenue.
Real estate property taxes represent nearly 60% of San Francisco’s local tax revenue, according to Barclays, which says that revenues are expected to barely increase over the next five fiscal years.
A 2022 report from the city’s chief economist found that, in a worst case scenario, San Francisco could lose $200 million in property tax revenue by 2028 because of remote workers.
This year more than a third of the city's officer buildings are vacant, which means owners are dumping projects that no longer make sense and buildings are selling at far lower values than they were pre-pandemic. Case in point, a 16-story office tower just sold for 10% of its pre-pandemic price.
Deeply discounted office towers have become the norm in San Francisco over the past year, but no recent deal has been as radical as one that closed in the city’s struggling Mid-Market neighborhood this month: An empty 16-story tower traded for just $6.5 million.
The $72 per square foot pricing for the tower at 995 Market St., which anchors the corner at 6th and Market streets, represents a 90% drop in value from when the building last sold in 2016, for roughly $62 million.
With office vacancy in San Francisco estimated at 36.6% four years after the pandemic, there is no shortage of deals to be had in the city. One office broker told the Chronicle last year that almost every office property in the city is “on sale.”
Of course far lower prices will eventually mean far lower rents and that will draw people in to these spaces. But property taxes are based on an assessed value and if sales demonstrate the value of downtown SF is now half of what it was five years ago, that's going to mean a lot less revenue coming in to the city. Meanwhile, wages and costs are up thanks to inflation. It's hard to see where the city is going to be able to cut a billion dollars over the next three years without impacting critical services such as transportation, public safety, sanitation, etc. Significant cuts to any of these could in turn make downtown less appealing and pretty soon you're right back to talking about the doom loop.
I'm on record saying I think San Francisco has too much going for it to ever be down and out permanently. It will recover, eventually. The question is how long that will take and how much pain will be experienced along the way. Right now the immediate future is not looking very bright.
Republicans’ fault.
I wonder what the leaning tower of San Francisco is worth, if these others have decreased so much.
My PSA went up to 6.5 from 4.5. That’s ok because they raised the ok threshold when I turned 70.
I expect SF and many other failing Democrat cities to be in lne for various handouts embedded in Democrat omnibus bills - if Biden or his replacement wins in November.
As we have seen, Republicans controlling some or even all of Congress is no impediment to passing the sort of spending bills that politicians and the main media sucessfully characterize as a dire “emergency” situation.
Take 30 mg of lycopene a day, and some fish oil, and together, your PSA score should dip some.
More options to reduce, here:
https://www.livestrong.com/article/411179-can-vitamins-and-supplements-affect-psa-readings/
https://www.wikihow.com/Lower-Prostate%E2%80%93Specific-Antigens-(PSA)
Get all the San Francisco Sound rock groups to have a concert in the park with volunteers passing the hat for donations.
Jefferson Airplane before Grace Slick.
It’s No Secret.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJVvHj0USyA
Let’s Get Together
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DIluFDkw0g
What’s pathetic is the city’s Mayor and the California state Governor have no clue as to why. Someone should inform them that tax revenues go DOWN when you penalize the taxpayers, forcing them to leave.
Keep voting Democrat.
I have fond memories of watching the Jefferson Airplane and other rock groups at free concerts in the GG Park Panhandle near Haight/Ashbury in the mid-1960s. This is before things got expensive a couple years later with paying $3.50 a ticket at Fillmore West, lol. At one free concert at GG Park, I got all the members of Grateful Dead to sign a record album cover. Those were good times, the city was clean and decent.
That lyrical section by Hunter S. Thompson——
There was madness in any direction, at any hour. You could strike sparks anywhere. There was a fantastic universal sense that whatever we were doing was right, that we were winning...
And that, I think, was the handle — that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn’t need that. Our energy would simply PREVAIL. There was no point in fighting — on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave...
So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high water mark — that place where the wave finally broke, and rolled back.”
― Hunter S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.