“I’m pretty sure there is indeed important stuff that needs to be separated from the made up stuff.”
And you know which of GP’s claims is real, and which of their claims is made up, how, exactly? Do you roll dice? Throw darts?
Why do you think anyone would take your judgement seriously when you’re using a source that YOU know makes stuff up?
Before the internet, conservative journalism thrived and wasn’t making stuff up. Human Events. National Review. American Spectator. University Bookman. Intercollegiate Review.
Now with the internet we instead have a tidal wave of grifters and conspiracy nutbags making stuff up. There’s progress for ya.
This was my fear when I first became involved with the Internet in the early 1990s. I could see that there would be no vetting of anything, and the time would come when nobody could trust anything.
And you know which of GP’s claims is real, and which of their claims is made up, how, exactly? Do you roll dice? Throw darts?
The same way you know what's real and what's fake?
Unbelievable.
I'm talking to a moron.
Before the internet, conservative journalism thrived and wasn’t making stuff up. Human Events. National Review. American Spectator. University Bookman. Intercollegiate Review.
All of those sources you mention, every source gets things wrong. Every single source has to be checked. You don't understand that???
You think I blindly cite information from GP without checking their "facts"? I do that for every source?
Apparently, you don't know how to do that?