Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/07/2024 10:58:09 AM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: bitt

DOA upon Trump’s arrival.


2 posted on 04/07/2024 10:59:20 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Bureaucrat Spies should be the easiest to FIRE


3 posted on 04/07/2024 10:59:26 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Transfer them to Hell


4 posted on 04/07/2024 11:00:25 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Yeah because it used to be SO EASY to get federal employees fired.


5 posted on 04/07/2024 11:01:14 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

A new role is not a law. What a dope.


6 posted on 04/07/2024 11:02:12 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Navarro didn't kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

(THIS ARTICLE WAS FREE TO ME, BUT IN CASE YOU CAN’T SEE IT...)

“We need to make it much easier to fire rogue bureaucrats who are deliberately undermining democracy or at a minimum just want to keep their jobs,” President Trump said in a speech at the America First Policy Institute on July 26, 2022, promising to “drain the swamp and root out the deep state.”

The former president went further in his speech, calling on Congress to pass laws that would give the commander-in-chief the authority to fire any government employee basically at will.

“Congress should pass historic reforms empowering the president to ensure that any bureaucrat who is corrupt, incompetent, or unnecessary for the job can be told ‘you are fired, get out,’” he said, adding that, after such reforms, Washington would be an “entirely different place.”

Later on the campaign trail, President Trump repeatedly hinted at his intention to make good on this promise. His remarks dovetail with a long-standing desire on the part of many Republicans to prune what they say is a bloated, inefficient and, in many cases, counterproductive federal bureaucracy.

Many Democrats, on the other hand, see the potential revival of a Schedule F or similar initiative as a threat to the operations of government and a potential disruption to the provision of critical services.

“This final rule honors our 2.2 million career civil servants, helping ensure that people are hired and fired based on merit and that they can carry out their duties based on their expertise and not political loyalty,” OPM Director Kiran Ahuja said in a statement.

“The Biden-Harris Administration is deeply committed to the federal workforce, as these professionals are vital to our national security, our health, our economic prosperity, and much more.”

The new rule, which is nearly 240 pages long, apparently seeks to put up a roadblock to prevent President Trump, or anyone else for that matter, from issuing another executive order that would reclassify civil servants.

The White House didn’t respond to a request for comment by press time.

Trump campaign spokesperson Karoline Leavitt pointed to President Trump’s Agenda 47 plan to “dismantle the deep state and return power to the American people,” which includes an explicit pledge to re-issue the 2020 executive order, “wield that power aggressively,” and “fire rogue bureaucrats.”

What’s in the New Rule?

The rule, which is being published in the federal registry and is set to take effect next month, is poised to counter a future Schedule F executive order by entrenching the status and civil service protections accrued by federal employees.

It stipulates that the job protections accrued by a government worker cannot be taken away by an involuntary move from the competitive service (appointments that are subject to OPM hiring rules and pay scales) to the excepted service (appointments that follow a separate, often more streamlined hiring process).

Similarly, moves from one excepted service schedule to another would not strip federal employees of those protections under the new rule.

“Once a career civil servant earns protections, that employee retains them unless waived voluntarily,” the OPM said in a statement.

The rule also makes clear that policymaking classifications apply to noncareer and political appointments and cannot be applied to career civil servants.

Specifically, the new rule stipulates that the phrase “confidential, policy determining, policymaking, or policy-advocating” positions (which describe positions lacking civil service protections) can be used to refer only to noncareer, political appointments and may not be applied to career civil servants to strip them of protections.

The final rule also establishes new procedural requirements for moving positions from the competitive service to the excepted service and within the excepted service. In particular, it creates an appeals process for federal employees when any such movement is involuntary and involves stripping workers of their civil service protections.

“This final rule builds on three years of the Biden-Harris Administration’s efforts to strengthen federal agencies and the federal workforce,” OPM Deputy Director Rob Shriver said in a statement.

The agency said it had reviewed more than 4,000 comments submitted during the public comment period as part of the rulemaking process.


7 posted on 04/07/2024 11:02:55 AM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Hah “rules”. Rules mean nothing. Rules are optional anymore. What stinky Joe rules can be broken by Trump.

Joe breaks rules all the time.


8 posted on 04/07/2024 11:03:39 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

P


9 posted on 04/07/2024 11:03:48 AM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Don’t try firing them, draft them into military units and assign them border guard duties in the middle east.


10 posted on 04/07/2024 11:03:51 AM PDT by redcatcherb412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

It should be Spies and Saboteurs


13 posted on 04/07/2024 11:05:01 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

No concern. Executive orders by this dipstick can be flushed down the toilet by Trump later.


14 posted on 04/07/2024 11:05:34 AM PDT by cross_bearer_02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Think we do not have a “deeps state”?


15 posted on 04/07/2024 11:08:11 AM PDT by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Transfer thousands of them to Adak Island in the Aleutian chain of Alaska. Do-nothing federal employees will love the weather and many cultural offerings there. The isolation will give them plenty of time to meditate.


18 posted on 04/07/2024 11:14:53 AM PDT by Gnome1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Just assign them to some remote closed military base with no internet or phone access and put them in 5x5 ft cubes.


23 posted on 04/07/2024 11:35:13 AM PDT by NewHampshireDuo ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

A rule that can be un-made...


24 posted on 04/07/2024 11:38:17 AM PDT by SuperLuminal ( Where is Samuel Adams when we so desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Looking for , “the executive power shall be vested in the Office of Personnel Management” in the Constitution and not finding it.


26 posted on 04/07/2024 11:39:17 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Any rule they arbitrarily install can just as arbitrarily be removed...


28 posted on 04/07/2024 11:42:51 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

We shall treat them as Nazi Commie Pinkos and assign them to ropes.

Well…..I like the thought of it anyway.


29 posted on 04/07/2024 11:45:35 AM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

No need to have mass firings. Implement strict management to implement Trump’s policies.

When they let their politics interfere with their job, fire them for cause.


30 posted on 04/07/2024 11:46:09 AM PDT by farmguy ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

“Biden Admin Installs New Rule Making It Harder to Fire Bureaucrats”

Bidet’s Deep State Protection Act.


31 posted on 04/07/2024 11:52:38 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (I went to bed on November 3rd 2020 and woke up in 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson