Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Military Has Started Recalling Retirees Due to Recruiting Crisis
https://theleadingreport.com ^ | 4/2/2024 | STAFF

Posted on 04/02/2024 8:00:40 PM PDT by bitt

he U.S. Army Publishing Directorate released the ALARACT 017/2024, titled, “Utilization of the Army Retiree Recall Program.”

The document cites Executive Order 13223 from the Bush administration in 2001.

A retiree recall is a “retired Soldier who is ordered to active duty (AD) from the Retired Reserve or the retired list under 10 USC 688/688a, 12301(a), or 12301(d). Per AR 601-10, Recalled retiree Soldiers must be aligned to a valid vacant AC requirement that matches the grade and skill of the retiree before he or she may be recalled to AD,” according to the document. “The retiree population will be utilized as a last resort to fill Active Component vacant requirements.”

The ALARACT 017/2024 comes as the U.S. military is experiencing a recruitment crisis.

The U.S. Army recently announced that it is cutting thousands of positions. Authorized troop levels will now be an estimated 470,000 by fiscal year 2029, down 24,000 from its 494,000 soldiers.

“While making these investments and adding formations, the Army must also reduce force structure to protect readiness in light of decreased end strength. The Army is currently significantly over-structured, meaning there are not enough soldiers to fill out existing units and organizations. Army leaders seek to have at least 470,000 soldiers in the Active Component by FY29, which is nearly 20,000 above the current end strength but a reduction of about 24,000 authorizations compared to currently planned force structure,” the report states.

It added that the Army is “undertaking a similarly important transformation of its recruiting enterprise so that it can man units sufficiently, continue to bring the right types and amounts of new talent into the Army, and rebuild its overall end strength.” Noting the ongoing recruitment failure within the U.S. military, the document noted, “The Army must solve its recruiting challenges to successfully transform for the future.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: bloggers; military; recallmilretirees; recallretirees; recruiting; retired
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN40510-ALARACT_0172024-000-WEB-1.pdf
1 posted on 04/02/2024 8:00:40 PM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN40510-ALARACT_0172024-000-WEB-1.pdf


2 posted on 04/02/2024 8:00:56 PM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

“The U.S. Army recently announced that it is cutting thousands of positions. Authorized troop levels will now be an estimated 470,000 by fiscal year 2029, down 24,000 from its 494,000 soldiers.”

Take that Putin!!! We don’t need no troops because WE ARE AMERICA and thus WE ARE INVINCIBLE!


3 posted on 04/02/2024 8:04:28 PM PDT by BobL (The USA was not built with DEI and it will not survive being forced into DEI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

This is a precursor to a Draft. And let’s hope those Chinee aircraft and naval vessels circling Taiwan like wolves are there to provide humanitarian aid.


4 posted on 04/02/2024 8:08:48 PM PDT by numberonepal (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

You claim they are calling up retirees?

And are there any major changes in the routine rules for calling back retired officers in this new document?


5 posted on 04/02/2024 8:12:08 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Correct. And Putin doesn’t have Satanist chaplains in the army, or sustainable green warships built without ‘sexist’ urinals.


6 posted on 04/02/2024 8:12:31 PM PDT by rfp1234 (E Porcibus Unum )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BobL

“In simpler language, they drafted me”


7 posted on 04/02/2024 8:13:12 PM PDT by ducttape45 (Proverbs 14:34, "Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt

With this commander in chief?

No way...


8 posted on 04/02/2024 8:15:19 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
One can only assume that the other branches will do the same.
9 posted on 04/02/2024 8:16:38 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Our military readiness hasn’t diminished. At least that’s what Freeper war-mongers would have you think. They can’t even get anyone to enlist in our Armed Services. Pretty pathetic that the government has to tap people who have already served their country to fight the wars they have planned. And after making it mandatory that every person serving had to get the clot shots. What a bunch of freaking ingrates.


10 posted on 04/02/2024 8:17:56 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal
This is a precursor to a Draft.

No draft. But I guess we can recall retired soldiers. If it's in their contract...

11 posted on 04/02/2024 8:19:19 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Another sign we’ve moved from a High-Trust Society to a Low-Trust Society ... just sayin


12 posted on 04/02/2024 8:20:15 PM PDT by 11th_VA (Celebrate Climate Change !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
"And are there any major changes in the routine rules for calling back retired officers in this new document?"

Why don't you go and try to find the answer to your question yourself? If you want the answer bad enough, you would. Or are you too lazy to do that?

13 posted on 04/02/2024 8:20:17 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
I was lucky enough to have had only two Commanders-In-Chief...Nixon and Ford...who both served honorably as Naval officers. I think I would have deserted rather than serve under BillyBob,Osama Obama or The Big Guy.
14 posted on 04/02/2024 8:20:50 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
"According to researchers, low-trust societies are typically kinship-based;[1] outcomes of low-trust societies can include difficulty in forming and maintaining corporate structures.[2] Mechanisms and institutions that are corrupted, dysfunctional, or absent in low-trust societies include respect for private property rights, a trusted civil court system ..."

In case you were wondering ...

15 posted on 04/02/2024 8:22:21 PM PDT by 11th_VA (Celebrate Climate Change !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
And are there any major changes in the routine rules for calling back retired officers in this new document?

Yes, starting in March 2024, the Army has now given itself the authority to fill vacancies through retiree recall, so get ready:

THE RETIREE RECALL PROGRAM CAN BE AN EFFECTIVE TOOL TO FILL PERSONNEL SHORTAGES OF AUTHORIZED REGULAR ARMY VACANCIES THAT ARE CONSIDERED KEY AND ESSENTIAL.

ALARACT 017/2024
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN40510-ALARACT_0172024-000-WEB-1.pdf
16 posted on 04/02/2024 8:22:29 PM PDT by Right_Wing_Madman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

You guys are trying to sell the nonsense, not me.

The thread is trying to give the impression that retired officers being liable to call back is new and that we are already calling them back.


17 posted on 04/02/2024 8:23:24 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Right_Wing_Madman

Retired officers have always been liable to call back, even enlisted are if their initial enlistment doesn’t cover their much tinier window of obligation.


18 posted on 04/02/2024 8:27:13 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bitt

No problem fighting a fifteen front forever war.


19 posted on 04/02/2024 8:34:28 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_Wing_Madman

I said officers, but retirees are liable to recall and it isn’t new.

After 9/11 retired green berets were being sought at the time, I was under the impression they were being asked to come back rather than ordered, but there are many slots that doctors, dentists, scientists, experts in older systems etc. that can be needed during various situations.


20 posted on 04/02/2024 8:37:30 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson