Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PBRCat

I was convinced they were going to steal the election for Harris. They only needed to print up 1700 votes for the win.

Why didn’t they steal it? Too much scrutiny? Saving it for Biden 2024?

I am just glad Chicago will have a tough-on-crime attorney. Of course, she can’t do a thing about cashless bail or force woke judges to sentence appropriately instead of slapping the wrists of criminals.

At least it is a start with an attorney who is willing to prosecute crimes. Hooray for the Chicago suburban voters who are waking up a little bit and realizing their past voting patterns are a big part of the problem.


2 posted on 03/29/2024 5:43:06 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (America -- July 4, 1776 to November 3, 2020 -- R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

My instincts tell me that the Machine did try to steal the primary election, but Burke performed so well that that the thieves underestimated the number of votes needed to cover.

Burke also had experienced watchers stationed at the Board of Elections to check every late ballot.

Earlier this week, the Board of Elections found an additional 10,000 ballots that were omitted from an accounting of vote by mail ballots. Nevertheless, these votes were not enough.

Officially, Eileen O’Neill Burke won by only 1,555 votes in the entire county. My guess is that her real margin was much greater, but the numbers were doctored.


4 posted on 03/29/2024 5:49:53 PM PDT by PBRCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

A whole LOT of Americans are watching with critical and professional eyes.


12 posted on 03/29/2024 7:15:17 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no poroof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
I was convinced they were going to steal the election for Harris. They only needed to print up 1700 votes for the win. Why didn’t they steal it? Too much scrutiny? Saving it for Biden 2024?

They "found" an extra 10,000 mail-ins that were heavily weighted for Harris, but it wasn't enough. It would have been too much for them to have "found" another stack of mail-ins. This was, after all, a contest between two Democrats, and the last thing they want is for a Democrat who has been blatantly cheated to make a stink about it all through the summer.

THIS IS WHY YOU SHOULD NOT VOTE EARLY. WAIT UNTIL ELECTION DAY. Otherwise, the bastards know how many cheat-by-mail-ins they need.

14 posted on 03/29/2024 10:27:59 PM PDT by HandBasketHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson