Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CFW
There is NO excuse for any aspect of the design or operation of a “voting” machine to be protected as proprietary information. The only reason for secrecy is to make fraud difficult to detect. I’m sure Dominion would protest with something like, “We have to keep certain information secret to prevent hacking”, or some such excuse, but then they’ve insisted that the machines are not online (a lie), so there should be no vulnerability from outside.

Any public officials who approved the use of “voting” machines that just add unnecessary complexity to the process, and agreed to terms of use that essentially make them an obscure “black box” are either drooling idiots, or they’re in on the scheme to commit fraud in elections. Both the additional complexity and the vendor-demanded secrecy make these systems ripe for fraud, and I think that is the real reason they exist.

26 posted on 03/19/2024 1:06:06 AM PDT by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: noiseman

“There is NO excuse for any aspect of the design or operation of a “voting” machine to be protected as proprietary information. The only reason for secrecy is to make fraud difficult to detect. I’m sure Dominion would protest with something like, “We have to keep certain information secret to prevent hacking”, or some such excuse, but then they’ve insisted that the machines are not online (a lie), so there should be no vulnerability from outside.”

Dominion used generated QR codes which can provide a modest amount of security benefit.


40 posted on 03/19/2024 3:38:12 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson