Thanks, but what do they claim is the random connection? Is it something he did before or on J6, or something he did or said after J6?
In some cases it is merely some one who is nominally “pro Trump” being in the capitol that day. But people have been convicted who weren’t even in the capitol, they just happened to belong to the same organization as someone who was or posted something on social media that linked them to J6.
There are numerous threads here and stories on conservative news sites detailing these political persecutions.
If you are looking for logic or consistency, you won’t find it. For DC juries, the mere accusation is sufficient proof and the prosecutors and judges know it.