To: maro
I think that the Supreme Court will adopt some iteration of qualified sovereign immunity. Integral to this concept is whether the employee was acting within the normal course and scope of his job. If he was, he is immune. If he wasn’t, there is no immunity.
28 posted on
02/29/2024 12:33:39 PM PST by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 202)
To: thegagline
The more important point related to sovereign immunity is that a President should never be subject to prosecution by an Executive Branch department that operates under the direct oversight of the Office of the President of the United States. It’s even more ludicrous when you consider that the Justice Department didn’t even exist when the Constitution was written.
48 posted on
02/29/2024 1:13:39 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
(If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
To: thegagline
I think that it would be hard to define “normal” in a way that makes policy sense.
57 posted on
02/29/2024 1:50:11 PM PST by
maro
(MAGA!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson