Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maro

I think that the Supreme Court will adopt some iteration of qualified sovereign immunity. Integral to this concept is whether the employee was acting within the normal course and scope of his job. If he was, he is immune. If he wasn’t, there is no immunity.


28 posted on 02/29/2024 12:33:39 PM PST by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 202)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: thegagline
The more important point related to sovereign immunity is that a President should never be subject to prosecution by an Executive Branch department that operates under the direct oversight of the Office of the President of the United States. It’s even more ludicrous when you consider that the Justice Department didn’t even exist when the Constitution was written.
48 posted on 02/29/2024 1:13:39 PM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: thegagline

I think that it would be hard to define “normal” in a way that makes policy sense.


57 posted on 02/29/2024 1:50:11 PM PST by maro (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson