Posted on 02/26/2024 9:02:55 AM PST by janetjanet998
Several NATO and EU members are "considering sending troops to Ukraine" on a "bilateral basis
Slovakia's PM Robert Fico added, "I cannot say for what purpose and what they should be doing there," after making the claims.
Or supply enough drones that Russian artillery is decimated, or supply enough longer range munitions to wreck Russian logistics.
Why fight on Russia’s terms?
Pretty much agreed on that. We never got the Ukies enough of the right weapons, and definitely not in a timely manner, for a broad counteroffensive.
The Russians dug in - gotta wreck and I do mean WRECK their logistics behind their lines 1st...
The Russians have crappy logistics. The Ukrainians had some success in taking out some of their logistics, especially in 2022.
Why didn't they continue to do that during their counteroffensive?
The main strength for the Russians is their ability to endure casualties.
Putin controls... the world's largest and most modern nuclear arsenal. He has said multiple times that Russia will not accept defeat in Ukraine. As the most accomplished authority on Putin on this forum, under what conditions do you feel that he would push the big red button?
Keep in mind that the people who specialize in the risk of nuclear war now have the “doomsday clock” set at 90 seconds to midnight. This is the closest that it has ever been to nuclear war since it's inception.
https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/timeline/
We live in dangerous times but the Zeepers in this forum feel that saving the corrupt puppet regime in charge of Ukraine is worth killing Billions of people and destroying civilization as we know it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.